عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
Aim: The aim of this study is to introduce the methods of transferring relational databases to ontology, classification of entering resources for transferring methods and identify the most important methods which exist in each group.
Method: In this study, bibliographic analysis was used to gather and examine papers published on transferring relational databases to ontology. Some papers are derived from paper databases and others from papers published on the Internet.
Results: After identifying the existing methods for transferring relational databases to ontology, they were classified into three groups: relational schema, conceptual data models and HTML pages of which the easiest accessible source is HTML pages which does not need cooperation of owner of the relational databases. However, since they can't be considered as real relational databases the hidden concepts in relational databases can't be derived from this source. In terms of data access, it should be noted that retrieval of all records in a relational database through the web-site is impossible. Creating conceptual model is always the first step in the process of creating database, so this model may not express the latest changes and corrections made in the database. The changes in implementation level are not usually reflected in the conceptual model. The conceptual model may not be accessible after designing and creating database. Also, some conceptual model tools do not support all features of conceptual models. Therefore, the relational schema seems to be the best source to create ontology from relational databases, when the database structure and data be accessible and owner of database is cooperative.
شادگار ب.، عصاره ع. و هراتیان نژادی آ. (1389). وب معنایی: مفاهیم و تکنیکها. تهران: ارمغان.
Astrova I. and Kalja A. (2007). Rule-Based Transformation of SQL Relational Databases to OWL Ontologies, In The Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Metadata & Semantic Research (CD-ROM), Ionian Academy, Corfu, Greece.
Astrova I. and Stantic B. (2006). An HTML Forms Driven Approach to Reverse Engineering of Relational Databases to Ontologies, In The Proceeding of the 23rd IASTED International Conference on Databases and Applications (DBA), 246-251, Innsbruck, Austria.
Benslimane S. M., Benslimane D., Malki M., Amghar Y. and Hassane H. S. (2006). Acquiring OWL Ontologies from Data-Intensive Web Sites, ICWE'06: In The Proceedings of the 6th Iinternational Conference on Web Engineering, 361-368, New York, USA.
Etminâni K., Kâhâni M. and Yânesâri N. R. (2009). Building Ontology from Relational Database, NDT2009: In The Proceeding of First International Conference on Networked Digital Technology, 555-557, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
He B., Patel M., Zhang Z. and Chang K. (2007). Accessing the Deep Web, Communications of the ACM, 50(5), 94-101.
Li M., Du X. and Wang S. (2005). Learning Ontology from Relational Database, In The Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC'2005), 6, 3410-3415, Hong Kong, China.
Li M., Du X. and Wang S. (2005). A Semi-automatic Ontology Acquisition Method for the Semantic Web, Advances in Web-Age Information Management, 3739, 209-220, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Stojanovič L., Stojanovič N. and Volz R. (2002). Migrating Data-Intensive Web Sites into the Semantic Web, In Proceeding of 2002 ACM Symposium in Applied Computing, 1100-1107, Madrid, Spain.
Upadhyaya S. and Kumar P. (2005). ERONTO: A Tool for Extracting Ontologies from Extended E/R Diagrams, In Proceedings of SAC‟05 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Xu Z., Cao X., Dong Y. and Su W. (2004). Formal Approach and Automated Tool for Translating ER Schemata into OWL Ontologies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3056, 464–476, Springer, Berlin, Germany.