Scientometrics
Shahnaz Khademizadeh; sara dakhesh; Roghayeh Ghazavi
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Scientific misconduct followed by retracted publications is one of the main obstacles to the development of societies, as it damages the material capital and scientific reputation of journals, organizations and countries. The present research has analyzed the characteristics ...
Read More
Background and Objectives: Scientific misconduct followed by retracted publications is one of the main obstacles to the development of societies, as it damages the material capital and scientific reputation of journals, organizations and countries. The present research has analyzed the characteristics of retracted publications extracted from the Web of Science database in engineering sciences, physical sciences, humanities and social sciences published in the years from 1992 to 2021.
Methodology: The present research has analyzed the characteristics of retracted publications extracted from the Web of Science database in engineering sciences, physical sciences, humanities and social sciences published in the years from 1992 to 2021.This research has used various bibliometric indicators, including the number and rank of publications, the number of citations, and the centrality indices in the collaboration network of countries, based on the research areas.
Findings: The results showed that engineering science ranked higher than other non-medical fields on the global scale with 2996 retracted documents and 23156 citations received. It was also found that subject areas with most violations and fraudulent publications in each of the aforementioned sciences are “Energy Fuels” from engineering sciences, “Chemistry Multidisciplinary” from physical sciences and “Education Educational Research” from humanities and social sciences with 1038, 316, and 84 retracted works, respectively. In addition, the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China had the highest level of collaboration in the prevalence of retracted publications in different fields of science.
Discussion: It is suggested that policymakers formulate long-term plans to protect the health of research by promoting the culture of systemic thinking in the research system, continuously teaching the principles of publication ethics, and informing the main actors of research, i.e., scholars, publishers, editors, and reviewers of journals. It is suggested that policymakers formulate long-term plans to protect the health of research by promoting the culture of systemic thinking in the research system, continuously teaching the principles of publication ethics, and informing the main actors of research, i.e., scholars, publishers, editors, and reviewers of journals.
Scientometrics
sara dakhesh; Elham Rezaei; Marzieh Mahmoodi; Ali Hamidi
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Altmetrics enable monitoring, tracking, and evaluating the role of authors and scientific and research publications in line with citations. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effects of altmetrics on Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) of articles published ...
Read More
Background and Objectives: Altmetrics enable monitoring, tracking, and evaluating the role of authors and scientific and research publications in line with citations. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effects of altmetrics on Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) of articles published about osteoporosis by Iranian researchers and indexed in Scopus during 2008-2017Methodology: This study was a descriptive survey and the research population included all the articles on osteoporosis, as a keyword by affiliated authors of Iran, indexed in Scopus during 2008-2017. Based on the initial search, 512 articles were retrieved on February 25, 2018. In addition, the cut-off point was set to six, implying that all the articles with more than six citations were selected as samples. In this regard, 114 articles received at least six citations, and the FWCI for each of these articles was separately extracted from the Scopus database. Subsequently, PlumX data for these articles were manually extracted in five categories of Usage, Captures, Mentions, social media, and Citations. Finally, these data were analyzed using the statistical software R, version 3.3.1.Findings: Among the examined categories, Usage with the highest mean (216.482 ±468.081) was significantly different from the other categories. However, mentions (13.271±23.478) was least welcomed by users. Besides, among the studied metrics, ‘Exports-Saves’ (p=0.022), ‘Citation Indexes’ in CrossRef (p=0.041), ‘Time’ (p>0.001), and ‘Citation Indexes’ in Scopus (p>0.001) had a positive and significant correlation with FWCI.Discussion: In general, the average FWCI increased by an increase in ‘Citation Indexes’ (in Scopus and CrossRef), ‘Exports-Saves’, and publication time. Therefore, it is recommended that universities, institutes, and research centers be made aware of the importance of researchers’ presence and membership in social networks. This increases the visibility of their research, and thus they can receive enough feedback to evaluate their works.
