A Survey of Barriers of Knowledge Sharing and Offreing Guidelines to Improve KS  among Kermanshah Public librarians

doi:10.22055/slis.2017.21553.1326

A Survey of Barriers of Knowledge Sharing and Offreing Guidelines to Improve KS among Kermanshah Public librarians

Document Type : Original Article

https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2017.21553.1326

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the status of knowledge sharing to determine the attitude of librarians towards knowledge sharing, to identify the potential barriers and to put forward effective solutions to improve the knowledge sharing in the public libraries of Kermanshah province.
Methodology: This study is as an applied study which has been carried out using survey method. It is also a quantitative study in terms of the type of data. For data collection, there was used a standardized questionnaire prepared by Chung, Yoon and John (2014). The research populations of the study included the librarians and managers of public libraries of Kermanshah province. In 2016, 69 public libraries with 181 librarians and managers have been active in public libraries. Based on Cochran formula, there are 123 samples in this study. It is worth mentioning that, in order to ensure about returning the questionnaires, there were distributed more questionnaires than needed (135); however all the questionnaires were returned. Data analysis was done in two parts of data description and inferential analysis using SPSS software.
Findings: The results showed that gender, marital status, major of study (except for the component of strategies of knowledge exchange improvement), education level, age and employment background of librarians have not been effective on the process of knowledge sharing and knowledge exchange in the public libraries of Kermanshah Province. Employment background is effective on the process of acquiring knowledge and strategies of knowledge exchange improvement; also, the librarians’ major of study is effective on the strategies of knowledge exchange improvement in the public libraries of Kermanshah Province. The city of employment has no effect on the process of knowledge sharing, but on the barriers of knowledge sharing instead. Regarding the different ways of knowledge exchange, the results showed that about 80 percent of librarians have reported informational and communicational technologies; about 54 percent, meeting with colleagues; 43 percent, social networks; about 24 percent, counseling method; about 15 percent, seminars or workshops and 0.7 percent have reported storytelling as the most common ways of knowledge exchange. 35.6 percent of librarians have used only one of the instruments of knowledge exchange; 26.7 percent have used two options; 25.9 percent, three options; 11.1 percent, four options and 0.7 percent of the librarians have used five options for knowledge exchange. Of the librarians who have used informational and communicational technologies for knowledge exchange, 45.2 percent have used telephone; 32.6 percent, e-mail; 23.7 percent, electronic discussion groups; 14.08 percent, weblogs and 14.08 percent have used the organization’s portal for knowledge exchange. The librarians have reported the followings as the main obstacles in the way of knowledge sharing: lack of a true rewarding system, lack of a system to introduce the individuals requiring knowledge sharing, also the weak verbal and written communications as well as weakness in interpersonal skills. From the view point of the librarians of Kermanshah province, the role of technology in the improvement of knowledge exchange and using newsletters and similar instruments in knowledge sharing are among the most significant strategies in promotion of knowledge exchange.
Discussion: The librarians have reported informational technology, meeting colleagues, social networks, consulting method, workshop and storytelling as the most common ways of knowledge exchange. They have also listed the followings as the most important barriers in the way of knowledge exchange: lack of a true rewarding system, lack of a system to introduce people who need knowledge exchange, weak oral and written interactions and weakness of internal skills. From the view point of the librarians, the role of technology in the improvement of knowledge exchange and using newsletters and similar instruments in knowledge sharing are among the most significant strategies in promotion of knowledge exchange.

Keywords

knowledge acquiring

Knowledge management

knowledge sharing

public libraries of Kermanshah province

Alam, S.S., Abdullah, Z., Ishak, N.A., Zain, Z.M. (2009). Assessing Knowledge Sharing Behaviour among Employees in SMEs: An Empirical Study. International Business Research, 2(2), 115-122.

AnwarulIslam, M., Ikeda, M., MaidulIslam, M. (2013). Knowledge sharing behavior influences: A study of Information Science and Library Management faculties in Bangladesh. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 39(3), 221-234.

Babalhavaeji, F., Jafarzadeh kermani, Z. (2011). Knowledge sharing behavior influences: a case of Library and Information Science faculties in Iran. Malaysian Journal of Library& Information Science, 16(1), 1-14.

Boateng, H., Dzandu, M. D., Agyemang, F. G. (2015). The effects of demographic variables on knowledge sharing. Library Review, 64(3), 216-228.

Chong, C. W., Yuen, Y. Y., Gan, G. C. (2014). Knowledge sharing of academic staff. A comparison between private and public universities in Malaysia. Library Review. 63(3), 203-223.

Dokhtesmati, M., Zarei, H. (2014). Study of knowledge sharing and university libraries website management in Tehran City. Information Processing and Management. 28(4), 945-969.

Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implication. Journal of knowledge Management, 6 (1), 23 – 30.

Gold, A.M., Maihotra, A., Segars, A.M. (2001). Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.

Hariri, N., Mohammadpour, L. (2013). Investigating the ralationship between job characteristics of librarians and the knowledge exchange motivation in libraries (Case study: The librarieis of the universities under the authority of the ministry of health and medical education-Tehran). Library and Information Science Research, 3(1), 67- 84.

Hassanzadeh, M & Ghorbani Busari, R. (2014). An Investigation to Knowledge Sharing amongst Librarians in Three Electronic Discussion Groups (ALA, ALIA & LIS-Iranian discussion list). Research on Information Science & Public Libraries, 20 (1), 127-149.

Hossein Gholizadeh, R., Afkhami Rouhani, H. (2013). The Relationship between knowledge sharing and ICT: Case Study.Managing Education in Organizations; 2(1), 61-85.

Jantunen, A. (2005). Knowledge-processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study, European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 336-349.

Kostagiolas, P. A. (2013). Managing Knowledge Capital in Public libraries For a Knowledge- driven socioeconomic environment.Library Management, 34 (8/9), 677-689.

Kostagiolas, P., Margiola, A., Avramidou, A. (2011). A library management response model against the economic crisis .Library Review, 60 (6), 486-500.

Lin, H.F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.

Lin, H.F.,Lee, G.G. (2004). Perceptions of senior managers toward knowledge-sharing behavior. Management Decision, 42(1), 108-125.

Madge, O. L. P. (2012). Creating a Culture of Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Libraries and Knowledge Management Models and Methods. Shanghai: InTech.

Mayekiso, N. (2013). Knowledge sharing practices in academic libraries with special reference to the Unisa Library.Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town.

Nemati-Anaraki, L., Nooshinfard F. (2014). Effective Organizational Factors in Knowledge Sharing from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members. Health Management; 17(56), 65-79.

Nemati-Anaraki, L., Nooshinfard, F., Babalhavaeji, F., Abazari, Z. (2013). Individual Factors of Knowledge Sharing among Faculty Members of Universities and Research Centers. HealthInformation Management; 10(5), 714- 725.

Onifade, F.N. (2015). Knowledge sharing among Librarians in Federal University Libraries in Nigeria. Information and Knowledge Management, 5(3), 91-97.

Robert, C.A. (2009). Annotation for knowledge sharing in a collaborative environment, Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 111-119.

Rudall, B.H., Mann, C.J.H. (2008). The challenges of the information society. Kybernetes, 37(6), 721 - 728.

Seba, I., Rowley, J., Lambert, S. (2012). Factors affecting attitudes and intentions towards knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force, International Journal of Information Management,32(4),372- 380.

ShifulIslam, Md., HossainKhan, R. (2014). Exploring the Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Practices in Dhaka University Library. Library Philosoply and Practice (e-journal), 1095. Retrieved February 28, 2016, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1095

Titi Amayah, A. (2013). Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 454-471.

Wang, S., Noe, R.A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research, Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.

Wickramasinghe, V., Widyaratne, R. (2012). Effects of interpersonal trust, team leader support, rewards, and knowledge sharing mechanisms on knowledge sharing in project teams. Vine, 42(2), 214 – 236.

Zarei, E., Momeni, E. (2014). The relationship between knowledge sharing and creativity among Libraries’ Librarians of Tarbiat Modares University. Knowledge Studies, 1(1), 19-31.

Zaqout, F., Abbas, M. (2012). Towards a model for understanding the influence of factors that stimulate university students’ engagement and performance in knowledge sharing. Library Review, 61 (5), 345-361.

Zawawi, A. and et al. (2011). The study of barriers factors in knowledge sharing: A case study in public university. Management Science and Engineering, 5(1), 59-70