مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اشتراک نشریه

شرایط و ضوابط ارسال مقاله

فرم ها

راهنمای تنظیم مقاله

داوران

مقایسه بروندادهای علمی اعضای هیات علمی کتابداری در مراکز پژوهشی و عوامل تاثیرگذار بر آن

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی (دانشیار) سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی ایران، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد رشته علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: مقایسه بروندادهای اعضای هیات علمی علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی در مراکز پژوهشی دولتی ایران و تعیین عوامل تاثیرگذار بر آن
روش­شناسی: برای  ارزیابی بروندادهای علمی از پیمایش  استفاده شد ؛ سپس  با استفاده از  تحلیل محتوای کیفی و رویکرد استقرایی عوامل بازدارنده  تولید آثار علمی از میان متون مرتبط با موضوع استخراج و در قالب پرسشنامه طراحی گردید . تحلیل­های آماری  با  برناه اکسل و نرم‌افزار اس.پی.اس.اس/ 16انجام شد. 
یافته­ها: گرایش به تولید مقاله بیش از سایر اقلام اطلاعاتی است.  زبان فارسی در تولیدات آمار بالاتری دارد . بیشترین سرانه تولید مربوط به سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی است. پس از آن پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران قرار دارد. اما از نظر تعداد برونداد علمی، مرکز منطقه‌ای اطلاع‌رسانی علوم و فناوری شیراز و بعد از آن  سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی بیشترین رتبه را داشته­اند .
نتیجه­گیری:  اعضای هیأت علمی مرکز بنیاد دایره‌المعارف  اسلامی، مرکز منطقه‌ای اطلاع‌رسانی علوم و فناوری شیراز، و پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی بیشترین موانع فردی ؛ اعضای هیأت علمی در فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی، بنیاد دایره­المعارف اسلامی، پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی بیشترین موانع  برون­سازمانی؛ و اعضای هیأت علمی در مراکز پژوهشگاه علوم و فرهنگ اسلامی، فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسی، و بنیاد دایره المعارف اسلامی و سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی بیشترین موانع درون‌سازمانی را داشته‌اند. لذا  مسئولان این مراکز می­بایست در جهت فراهم سازی مقدمات رشد برونداد علمی و کاستن موانع موجود اقدام نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Scientific output by Faculty Members of Library and Information Science in Governmental Research Centers in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Narges Neshat 1
  • Zahra Sadat Alami 2

1 Associate Professor, National Library and Archives of Iran, Tehran, Iran

2 MLIS of NLAI (National Library and Archives of Iran), Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: Today, the index of scientific outputs is in the focus of policy makers and decision makers at national and international levels; However, it alone cannot be considered a definitive sign for the all-round growth and development of science; But the fact is that today many decisions in the field of research and development are made based on the scientific outputs of countries and as a visual object, provide the possibility of comparison, judgment, and benchmarking.
Library and information science (LIS) has emerged, not only as a profession and the educational programme that supports it, but also as a research discipline. Research is needed to create new knowledge and there by contribute to the growth of LIS as a profession or discipline. If research and researcher are absent, non-existent or even scarce, there is no profession, but only an occupation grounded in techniques, routine and common sense. This is, of course, the important reason why research is conducted into library and information science (LIS), or why research products are important. That is why it is important to see what are the barriers to research outputs and how to overcome these barriers.  Librarians and other information specialists such as faculty members must to development effectiveness in LIS with their scientific output and services.  In this study we want to comparison of scientific products of faculty members of library and information science in research centers and determining the factors affecting it.
Methodology: Methodology is the means by which their searcher collects data, might consist of self-reports surveys, statistical analysis, or anather methods.  This study has been done with cientometric approach and two methods of content analysis and survey. Survey was used to rate and compare scientific output. Then, based on the qualitative content analysis of texts related to this subject, the barriers to scientific production were extracted and designed in the form of a questionnaire.
Findings: As mentioned, one of the main pillars of science production is the scientific community and their scientific fertility; And faculty members are one of the most basic elements of this scientific fertility. One of the consequences and products of their performance is products that appear in the form of information sources such as books, articles, reports, standards, etc. It is due to the existence of such products and consumption trends in the scientific community that the index of scientific fertility makes sense in this field. The importance of this index is that it can be used to express the status of scientific research in quantitative language and measure it, and thus achieve an objective picture of them in different areas of a country. The findings of this study showed that the tendency to produce an article is greater than other information items. Persian is also the dominant language. The highest per capita scientific production is related to the Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization with 156 scientific productions. Next is the Iranian Institute of Information Science and Technology, and the Research Institute of Islamic Science and Culture.
Discussion: Among the Inhibiting factors scientific production, Individual barriers to scientific production among faculty members of the three centers of the Islamic Encyclopaedia Foundation, the Shiraz Science and Technology Information Center, and the Research Institute of Islamic Science and Culture have been more than other centers. So, the faculty members of the Academy of Persian Language and Literature, the Islamic Encyclopedia Foundation, and the Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture have had most external barriers. Intra-organizational barriers are more common among the Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture, the Academy of Persian Language and Literature, and the Islamic Encyclopedia Foundation and the National Library and Archives. Therefore, it is suggested that each of these research centers take action to remove these barriers. Another point is to pay attention to efficient and scientific management in these centers. Because in the shadow of optimal policy in this field, individual, internal and external organizational barriers can change their place with opportunities. The management of research centers must be able to use downstream forces and their creativity properly. Facilitate faculty members' access to the organization's research programs; Dissemination of research culture and promotion of the value and dignity of the faculty members of the studied research centers are also among the things that can be achieved through proper research management.  In this study, inhibitory factors from the perspective of faculty members were considered; Therefore, to complete and compare the views, it is suggested that these factors be measured from the perspective of officials and managers of research centers and compared with the findings of the present study.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Government research centers
  • Faculty Members
  • Library and Information Science (LIS)
  • scientific output
  • Inhibiting factors
مراجع
Adkins, Denice & Budd, John (2006). "Scholarly productivity of U.S LIS faculty". Library & Information Science Research, 28(3), 374-389.
Ali Karami, Marzieh (2011). Analyzing the Status of Scientific Information Production and the Pattern of Scientific Participation of Faculty Members of the Faculties of Arts and Media Sciences and Media of Payame Noor University during the years 1994 - 2009, Mashhad: Payame Noor University, MA Thesis, Librarianship and Information Science. [In Persian]
Alyan Torghabei, Maryam (2010). The status of scientific outputs of Birjand University in Scopus and Web Assessment databases with emphasis on their scientific collaboration. Masters Degree in Librarianship and Information Science from Birjand University. [In Persian]
Braun, Tibor, Wolfgang Glänzel, and András Schubert) 2006).  A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientomerics 69 (1): 169-173.
Breschi, Stefano & Lissoni, Francesco (2008), "University patating and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventor’s conclusions". European management reviews., Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 91-109
Brodka, P. Saganowski, S. & Kazienko, P. (2013),GED; the method ofr group evolution discovery in social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3 (1), 1-14.
Carrio, M.; Wood, P. & Norman, A. (2004). "Barriers to research utilization among forensic mental health nurses". International Journal of Nursing Studies, No. 4, pp. 613 -619.
Cohen, M.D. & S.G. Jenning (2002). Agreement and reproducibility of subjective method of measuring faculty time distribution. Academic Radiology, No. 9, pp. 1-8.
Cook, D. (2001). Research management of what nature is the concept? Ohio State University.
Davari Ardakani, Reza (2002). About Science. Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian]
Ebrahimi, E. (2011). Evaluation of scientific output of faculty members of medical school and hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and Health Services by measuring Hirsch index. Master Thesis of Payame Noor University of Khorasan Razavi Province - Faculty of Art.
Ehsani , V ; M. Azami  ;S.M.B. Najafi ; F. Soheili  (2017).  The Effectiveness of Iran Ever-growing Research in Expanding Knowledge Boundaries.  National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, SUMMER 2017, Volume 28, Number 2 (110) #S00157; Page(s) 123 To 140. [In Persian]
Etemad, ُShapour (1999). Structure of Science and Technology in Iran and in a World. Tehran: Markaz Co Pub. [In Persian]
Fattahi, Rahmat; Danesh, Farshid and Soheili, Faramarz (2011). "A Study of the Global Status of Scientific Products of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in 1990-2010 in Web of Science with the Purpose of Drawing the Science Map of this University". Journal of Library and Information Science. 1 (Spring and Summer): 45-67. [In Persian].
Foroughinia, Faizullah (2010). Investigating the Status of Scientific Information Production of Faculty Members of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (1-6). Tehran: Islamic Azad University of North Tehran, Masters Degree in Library and Information Science.
Golshani, Mehdi (2014). Fever is a pest article, Saramad, No. 9 (March): 77-72. [In Persian]
Hasan, Nabi & Singh, Mukhtiar (2015). "Library and Information Science Research Output: A study based on Web of Science".  COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management. Volume 9, pp. 47-64
Horri, A. (2000). Investigation of Scientific and Research Activities of Faculty of Librarianship and Information Science by the end of end of 1999. Book Quarterly, 42, pp. 7- 39. [In Persian]
Horri, A. (1999). A Survey of Thematic Tendency of Scientific and Research Works of Iranian Library and Information Science from the Beginning to the End of 1998. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Use and Development of Computer cataloges in Iranian Libraries, Tehran27 – 28 nov.: The Agricultural Scientific Information & Documentation Center (ASIDC). [In Persian]
Ibegbulam, J. & Jacintha, U.  (2015)" Factors That Contribute to Research and Publication Output Among Librarians in Nigerian University Libraries ". Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.007
 Juznic, Primoz; Urbanija, Joze (2003). "Developing research skills in library and information science studies". Library Management, Vol. 24, n. 6/7. [online]. Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0143-5124.htm [11 Aug. 2007].
Kazemipour, Abdol Mohammad (1992). Design barriers to development in Iran. Rahyaft. No. 2, pp. 7-14. [In Persian]
Losee, Robert M. The Science of information: measurement and applications, New York: Academic Press, 1990. PP 237-253.
Mangi, Leela Dhar. "Research Output in Library & Information Science from 1996-2012: A Quantitative Analysis". Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 62-73.
 Mansouri, Reza (2013).  Four years in Atf. Tehran: Emarat. [In Persian]
Navarro, Albert & Martin, Miguel, (2008), Scientific production and collaboration in epidemiology and public health, 1997-2002: Scientometrics, 76(2), 291–313(2008).
Noroozi Chacoli, A.; M. Hassanzadeh;H. Noormohammadi;A. Etemadifard. Fifteen Years of Science Production of Iran in databases of the "Inistitute for Scientific Information" (ISI), Book Quarterly, 20(1),  Spring . [In Persian].
 
O'Brien, Terry & Cronin, Kieran (2016). "Research Output of Academic Librarians from Irish Higher Education Institutions 2000–2015: Findings from a Review, Analysis, and Survey". New Review of Academic Librarianship: Vol. 22, pp. 203-224.
Osareh, Farideh; Ghane, Mohammad Reza and Rahmani Sefidouieh, Mehrzad (2010). "The Status of Scientific Production of Faculty Members of Shiraz University in the Years 2000-2006". Book Quarterly, (83): 36-42. [In Persian].
Ossareh, Farideh and Bavi, Farah (2009). "Investigating the Status of Production of Scientific Information by Faculty Members of Oil Industry Research Institute, Journal of Library and Information Science, 46,2. [In Persian].
Pariyad, Rahman-Naser, Ahmad Reza and Liaqatdar, Mohammad Javad (2003). "Servey of Structural Barriers to Research among Faculty Members of Humanities Departments of Isfahan Universities and Western Region of Iran". In Proceedings of Higher Education and Sustainable Development, vol 2. Tehran: Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, pp. 93- 105. [In Persian].
Ragasa, C. (2011). Do Organizational Factors Affect Individual Scientist’s Productivity? A Comparative and Multilevel Analysis of Nigeria and Ghana Agricultural Research System, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Washington, D.C., pp. 1-29.
Research Barriers Identification Committee (2003). Identifying barriers to research and innovation in the country (long term and short-term planning). Rahyaft. (31): 26-35.
Rezadost, Karim; Areas, Abdolreza and Adibzadeh, Elham (2017). "Evaluation of Normative and Organizational Factors Affecting the Production of Academic Members. Case Study: Faculty Members of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz". Journal of Library and Information Science Studies Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (20):23- 42. [In Persian].
Sabouri, Ali Akbar (2003). "A Review of the Production of Science in 2003", Rahyaft, 14 (31): 21-23. [In Persian].
Sabouri, Ali Akbar (2010). " Iranian Production of Science in 2010". Rahyaft. (43): 21-31.
Sarati Shirazi, Mansoura and Goltaji, Marzieh (2011). "Evaluation of Scientific Dental Products Using Web of Science Database 2000-2009." Dental Journal of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2 (12): 170-173. [In Persian].
Schubert, A. (2002). "The Web of Scientometrics: A statistical overview of the first 50 volumes of the journal". Scientometrics, 53(1):3-20.
SCImago (2012). Forecasting exercise: How World Scientific Output will be in 2018. [online]. Available: http://www.scimagolab.com/blog/2012/forecasting-exercise-how-world-scientific-outpu t-will-be-in-2018.
SCImago (2015). Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved December 9, 2015 [online]. Available: http://www.scimagojr.com/countryr ank.php.
Serati Shirazi, M. and Goltaji, M. (2011). A study of dental scientific products using the Web of Science database from 2000 to 2009. Journal of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, 2(12): 170-173. [In Persian].
Shams, Nasser (2001). " The Current Credits of Research Institutes Affiliated with the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in the First and Second Development Plans". Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, (21-22): 135-172. [In Persian].
Sheikihnejad, Zeinab (2007). Investigating the Status of Academic Staff of Librarians and Information Sciences in Iranian Universities and Government Research Centers (2001-2004).
Masters Degree in Librarianship and Information Science, Librarianship and Information Science Department, University of Tehran. Supervisor: Dr. Narges Neshat [In Persian].
Soheili, Faramarz (2011). Drawing up the structure of scientific publications produced by faculty members of Tehran University of Medical Sciences on the Web of Science website. Health Information Management, No. 22. [In Persian].
Sulo, T., Kendagor, R., Kosgei, D., Tuitoek, D., Chelangat, S. (2012). Factors Affecting Research Productivity in Public Universities of Kenya: The Case of Moi University, Eldoret, Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences (JETEMS), 3(5): 475-484.
Tasviri Ghamsari, Fatima and Jahannama, Mohammad Reza (2006). "Investigating the Status of Scientific Production of Researchers of Engineering Research Institute". Journal of Library and Information Science, (2): 107 – 124. [In Persian].
Tayefi, Ali (2001). Cultural Barriers to Research Development in Iran: An Introduction to Thinking in Iran. Tehran: Azad Andishan Co Pub. [In Persian].
Tian, Yangge & Wen, Cheng (2008). Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006,  Journal of Informetrics, , Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2008, pp. 65-74.
Ugolini, Donatella & Neri, Monica, (2010), A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in mesothelioma research: Lung cancer., Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 129–135
 Wainer, Jacques & Xavier, Eduardo, (2009), Scientific production in computer science: a comparative study of ‌Brazil and other countries: Scientometrics, 81(2)., Article number: 535 (2009).
 Watty, K.; Bellamy, S. and Morely c. (2009). Factors affecting research productivity of faculty members in government universities. Lisrel and Neural Network Analyses, No. 30, pp. 67 – 78.
Zohour, Alireza and Fekri, Alireza (2002). "Research Barriers from the Viewpoints of Faculty Members of Iran University of Medical Sciences". Payesh. 2(2): 113-120. [In Persian].
مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات
دوره 11، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28
شهریور 1398
صفحه 197-222
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار