نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

2 کارشناسی ارشد علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان

چکیده

هدف: هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی اصول زیستی (شامل جامعیت، نکامل، تنوع، فعل و انفعالات) در مقالات پژوهشگران ایرانی علم اطلاعات و کتابداری نمایه شده در وبگاه علوم تا سال 2017 است.
روش‌شناسی: روش انجام این پژوهش تحلیل محتوا است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر کلیه مقالات پژوهشگران ایرانی علم اطلاعات است که در وبگاه علوم نمایه شده­اند. ابزار گرداوری داده­ها در این پژوهش سیاهه مقوله­بندی موضوعی زارعی (1393) می­باشد که موضوعات علم اطلاعات و دانش­شناسی را به 14 مقوله موضوعی اصلی و 110 مقوله موضوعی فرعی تقسیم کرده است. روایی ابزار این پژوهش توسط پنج نفر از متخصصان علم اطلاعات و دانش­شناسی تأیید گردید و ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به‌دست آمده برای تأیید پایایی این ابزار 0.889 می­باشد. در این پژوهش جهت تحلیل محتوای مقالات مورد بررسی از نرم­افزار و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش از نرم‌افزار‌های ,WordStat 7.0 Excel 2013 و SPSS 20 استفاده شده است.
یافته‌ها: طبق یافته­های این پژوهش در مقوله­های موضوعی مطالعات کاربران و کتابخانه­ها و فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات اصول زیستی در وضعیت خوبی قرار دارند. در مقوله کتابخانه­ها و مراکز اطلاع­رسانی اصول زیستی؛ جامعیت؛ تنوع و فعل­وانفعالات در وضعیت خوبی است. در مقوله موضوعی صنعت نشر و توزیع کم­ترین تکامل، تنوع و جامعیت مشاهده می­شود. در خدمات به کاربران اصول زیستی در وضعیت ضعیفی قرار دارد.
نتیجه ­گیری: به­طورکلی طبق نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش می­توان گفت روند خوب اصول زیست حوزه مطالعات کاربران نشان­دهنده اهمیت جامعه پژوهنده علم اطلاعات و دانش­شناسی در ایران به پژوهش­هایی بر مبنای نظرات کاربران است و این روند متکامل در مقوله کتابخانه و فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات نشان­دهنده نقش تعیین­کننده فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در این علم است. وضعیت ضعیف روند اصول زیستی در مقوله خدمات به کاربران نشان­دهنده ضعف پژوهش­ها پیرامون این مقوله است؛ بنابراین به توجه بیشتر پژوهشگران به این مبحث نیاز است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Study of the Bio-sciences of Iranian Researchers of Information Science and Library Indexed on the ISI

نویسندگان [English]

  • Oranus Tajedini 1
  • Marzieh Baniasadi 2

1 Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

2 Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: The general structure of human knowledge has a similar biological progress to living creatures. Through history, scientific ideas have lost their simplicity and appropriateness and become more complex. Adopting biological progress, scientific ideas go through some sort of such biological progress (birth to death) during their progress. Thus, such biological behavior could be seen in the scientific community; that is a scientific idea with a new perspective is put forward and the scientific community responds to that idea in different patterns so that the new idea is either accepted and goes through a development process or ignored after a little while so that it may appear again in another time. Scientific publishing are perceived to be fully reflecting the level of technical and specialized knowledge and information and are assumed to have a fundamental role in the complex system of scientific and technical exchanges and sharing the generated knowledge among different nations. For this mission, publishing scientific works, especially in form articles and journals, is one of the most important factors that responsible assessment agencies use for analysis of the level of generated knowledge. Through the development process of scientific systems, therefore, the world has reached a condition that the knowledge of any country has become the language and means for bolding out itself in the world in terms of science, such that it would become isolated and have nothing to say without such means, according to in Salehi and Rahimi, 2010 as cited in Abdekhoda, Mohammadi, Bigdeli, 2006).  Considering the above mentioned and that all sciences, including information and knowledge studies, are constantly changing, the main concern of this study is whether we can analyze and assess the path that scientific ideas go through within their biological process in time using biological rules based on comprehensiveness, evolution, variety, and actions and reactions (Abraham, 2007 as cited in Zarei 2014) which are described as follows: Comprehensiveness means extensiveness and inclusion in which all subject areas in information and knowledge studies are categorized based on the subject categorization outline in this science (2014). Evolution means the gradual alteration of subject areas in proportion to time and evolutionary speciation (Groom, Meffe, Carroll, 2006). Dictionary of Bibliometric defines variety as a synonym for dispersion which describes the normal findings in a subject matter. Action and reaction mean identification and determination of subject areas and their interaction with the environment; that is the effect of the environment on subject areas and vice versa which is known as the information ecology or the known biological patterns and tenets (Vigneswaran et al., 2007).
As Busha and Harter (1980: 8) have argued, the main proportion of researches related to library and information science are applied in nature and the evidence for such conclusion can be found by analyzing reports of such researches (as cited in Zarei 2014). This paper is no exception to this, i.e. it is applied and conducted by taking a quantitative approach and a bibliometric-content analysis method. Analysis of the content grounded on this presumption, the lexicon used in the interviews, observations, and documents may be categorized into areas which share a common vocabulary, meanings, and concepts (Krippendorff, 1980).
Researchers in the field of Information and Knowledge Studies (former Library and Information Science) since the beginning until 2017 who have been profiled in the Web of Science constitute the population of this study. There were totally 374 articles. The researcher started to collect subject vocabulary from titles, abstracts, and keywords in March 2017. It is worth mentioning that no sampling was performed since all the above-mentioned articles were analyzed.
Subject Categorization Model of Zarei (2014) was used as the instrument for analysis of the data collected from Web of Science profiled until 2015. Instrument reliability was established by five specialists in the field of Knowledge and Information Science and the Cronbach's alpha was calculated as 0.889. Articles used for the research were used as the units of analysis and Wordstat v. 7.0, Excel 2013 and SPSS v. 20 were used to analyze the data and respond to research questions.
Methodology: According to the collected the data, the highest subject comprehensiveness in the studied population was as follows based on the frequency: 1) user studies with 59 frequencies (15.78%); 2) library and information and communication technology with 54 frequencies (14.44%); 3) libraries and data centers with 47 frequencies (12.57%). In the subject category of user studies outside Iran with Rana (2011), Sugimoto et al. (2011) and Cavalk (2013), where there is similar emphasis on study of the needs of users and user studies, comparison of the data of this paper with data outside Iran revealed that user studies have become the subject of interest for researchers in recent years. User studies include sub-subject categories, such as satisfaction measurement, information requirements, reference interview, information seeking behavior, study habits, web using abilities, user interface and information literacy of users. High comprehensiveness of user studies is explained by the high proportion of focus on the user comment-based researchers and the high importance given to it by the Library and Information Science community in Iran. Library and Information and Communication is the second sub-category that has the highest frequency and concordance with findings of Niazi (2001), Afghahi (2007), Horri (2002), Salk (2009), Vaziripour Keshmiri, Sedehi, and Saberi (2012), Erfanmanesh, Didgah, and Omidvar (2010), and Rana (2011), which indicates the crucial and supplementary role of information and communication technology in Knowledge and Information Science because it has gone through a revolution since information and communication technology has entered thereto..
Findings: According to the findings of this paper, the lowest subject comprehensiveness was user services with 3 frequencies (0.8%) and ranked 14th which is contrary to the findings of Yontar and Yalvac (2000), therefore, it is concluded that user services studies have decreased over time. It is recommended that researchers pay more attention to this area since it is conceived as one of the most important issues in the library profession.
The intended data were extracted according to the data in Table 2 in order to measure the subject evolution of the articles under study. Findings indicated that Basics of knowledge and Information Science subject category in 2000-2008 with 8 average score, User Studies in 2008-2015 with 6.75 and Knowledge Management in 2008-2015 with 55.44 average scores had the highest evolution. No evolution was seen in Information Ethics, Technical Services or Organization of Knowledge and Storage and Restoration of Information subject categories. Fall of evolution was observed in Education of Knowledge and Information Science and Publishing and Distribution Industry subject categories.
Basics of Knowledge and Information Science subject category is in line with Abdulaye (2002) and Sugimoto et al. (2011) indicating the importance of this category as the basis of Knowledge and Information Science and thus the researched conducted in this area. User Studies subject category was in line with Cavalk (2013) which emphasizes the equal focus on studying user needs and user studies. Contrary to Babalhavaeji et al. (2014) no subject variety was seen in Education of Knowledge and Information Science subject category which indicates a weak point and, in fact, the lack of attention to training professionals and theoretical and practical teachings by researchers which may lead to future challenges in Iran in this regard.
Discussion:  Interactions of research community until 2015 was categorized into two groups based on the obtained data, as shown in table 2. 533 subject categories had interaction with another subject category. 487 subject categories had interaction with information and communication and 46 had interaction with other subject categories. Interactions of subjects of Iranian research articles profiled in Website of Science with information and communication technology was investigated separately because this subject area has had an influential role in the course of reforms and development of Knowledge and Information Science. It should be notified that with the introduction of new tools and software technology to the libraries, the librarian’s literacy level has extensively boosted.  Having tried to learn new information technologies, librarians can introduce health-related databases to users by holding various training courses in libraries. In spite of librarians’ higher Health Information Literacy, the entrance of technologically advanced utensils and electronic resources to libraries create anxiety filled environments. Therefore, librarians need to promote their skills in different fields especially in health information to avoid physical and mental damages. Librarians could make libraries a certain, safe and trusted place through secrecy maintenance, affability and reliability and providing necessary facilities for easy accessibility to health information required for users. Authorities could also have determinant role in the augment of librarians' Health Information Literacy. They could carry out this task by; purchasing and sending various sources of health, psychology and hygiene for libraries; purchasing health related databases to librarians and users; holding different conferences about Health Information Literacy for librarians; holding educational courses for all librarians in city; making them familiar with tools and new technological soft wares; holding study circles among librarians in city; creating communicative relationship among librarians and professionals like physicians and psychiatrists and finally establishing a provincial counseling center to lead librarians settle their own and members problems.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Biological Evolution
  • Biodiversity
  • Biological Interaction
  • Articles of Iranian Researchers
افقهی، اسماعیل (1386). بررسی روند موضوعی تحقیقات رشته کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی: براساس استناد­های 1996-2005 در مقالات مجله ARIST در سال­های 2002-2006. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد علوم کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی، دانشگاه تهران.
باب­الحوائجی، فهیمه؛ زارعی، عاطفه؛ نشاط، نرگس و نوشین­فرد، فاطمه (1393). نقشه دانش علم اطلاعات و دانش­شناسی براساس مقوله­بندی موضوعی اصلی و فرعی. مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات. 21 (13)، 1-24.
حافظ­نیا، محمد­رضا (1386). مقدمه­ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه­ها (سمت).
حری، عباس (1381). مطالعه میزان همبستگی موضوعی پایان­نامه و مقالات فارسی در رشته کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی ایران. مجله روان­شناسی و علوم تربیتی. 32 (1)، 43-74.
حری، عباس (1382). اکولوژی اطلاعات. اطلاع­شناسی. 1 (2)، 5-30.
حری، عباس (1387). درآمدی بر اطلاع­شناسی: کارکردها و کاربردها. تهران: دما و کتابدار.
دیوداتو، ویرجیل پاسکوئاله (1392). دانش­نامه علم­سنجی. مترجمان غلام­رضا حیدری و روح­الله خادمی. تهران: نشر کتابدار.
زارعی، عاطفه (1393). اصول و فرایند زیست موضوعات مقاله­های کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی ایران در سال­های 1380-1390. رساله دکترای علم اطلاعات و دانش­شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
سلک، محسن (1388). تحلیل محتوای مقالات منتشر شده در دو نشریه "فصلنامه کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی" و "فصلنامه کتاب" در سال­های 1385 و 1386. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی. واحد تهران شمال.
سیدین، سید مهرداد، و باب الحوائجی، فهیمه (1388). تحلیل محتوای پایان­نامه­های کارشناسی ارشد کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحدهای تهران شمال، علوم و تحقیقات تهران، علوم و تحقیقات اهواز و همدان در سال­های 1372-1386. تحقیقات اطلا­ع­رسانی و کتابخانه­های عمومی، 15 (1)، 95-128.
شرفی، علی، و نورمحمدی، حمزه­علی (1391). تعیین فرایند زیست موضوعات پایان­نامه­های کارشناسی ارشد و دکترای رشته کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی موجود در پایگاه اطلاعاتی پروکوئست (Proquest) از سال 2006-2010. فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان­دهی اطلاعات، 19 (10)، 41-60.
عبدخدا، هیوا؛ محمدی، لیلا و عبدالحسین، بیگدلی (1389). بررسی میزان تولیدات علمی کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی ایران بر مبنای مدارک موجود در پایگاه اطلاعاتی چکیده کتابداری، اطلاع­رسانی و فن­آوری اطلاعات (LISTA) در دهه اخیر (1999-2000). اطلاع­شناسی، 8 (30)، 24-38.
محسن­زاده کواریم، افسانه (1384). فرایند زیست روش­های پژوهش در پایان­­نامه­های کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی ایران (1347-1378). اطلاع­شناسی، 2 (3 و 4 ). 33-54.
مایر، ارنست (1384). جمعیت­ها، گونه­ها و تکامل: فرگشت زیستی و بیوسیستماتیک جانوری. ترجمه جمشید درویش. مشهد: واژگان خرد.
نشاط، نرگس (1388). پارادایم­های نظریه و نظریه­پردازی در علم اطلاعات. اطلاع­شناسی، 23، 3-22.
نیازی، سیمین (1380). بررسی گرایش­های موضوعی نشریات کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی در سال­های 1347-1377. فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان­دهی اطلاعات، 12 (1)، 61-52.
وزیرپور کشمیری، مهردخت؛ سه دهی، مریم و صابری، محمد کریم (1391). تحلیل محتوای چکیده­ پایان­نامه­های کارشناسی ارشد کتابداری و اطلاع­رسانی واحد تهران شمال و علوم وتحقیقات از سال 1380-1386. فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازمان­دهی اطلاعات، 23 (1)، 112-128.
Abdoulaye, K. (2002). Research trends in library and information science at the International Islamic University Malaysia. Library Review, 51(1), 32-37.
Aharony, N. (2012). Library and Information Science research areas: A content analysis of articles from the top 10 journals 2007–8. Journal of librarianship and information science, 44(1), 27-35.
Aliyu, Y., & Abba, T. (2009). Analytical study of master of library science dissertations at the University of Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Erfanmanesh, M. A., Didegah, F., & Omidvar, S. (2010). Research productivity and impact of Library and Information Science in the Web of Science. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 85-95.
Groom, M. J., Meffe, G. K., & Carroll, C. R. (2006). Principles of conservation biology (No. Sirsi) i9780878935185). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates
Kanazawa, S. (2004). Social sciences are branches of biology. Socio-Economic Review, 2(3), 371-390.
Kawalec, A. (2017). Research trends in library and information science based on Spanish scientific publication 2000 to 2010. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 18(2).
Koufogiannakis, D., Slater, L., & Crumley, E. (2004). A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal of information science, 30(3), 227-239.
Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology: Sage.
Qiu, J., & Lv, H. (2014). An overview of knowledge management research viewed through the web of science (1993-2012). Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 424-442.
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287.
Rafols, I., and Meyer, M. (2008). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinary: case studies in bioscience. Scientometrics 82 (2), pp. 263-287.
Rana, R. (2011). Research trends in library and information science in India with a focus on Panjab University, Chandigarh. The International Information & Library Review, 43(1), 23-42.
Sugimoto, C. R., Li, D., Russell, T. G., Finlay, S. C., & Ding, Y. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 185-204.
Tichy, N. (2006). Problem life cycles in the new world of biology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Vigneshwaran, N., Ashtaputre, N. M., Varadarajan, P. V., Nachane, R. P., Paralikar, K. M., & Balasubramanya, R. H. (2007). Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Aspergillus flavus. Materials letters, 61(6), 1413-1418.
Yontar, A., & Yalvac, M. (2000). Problems of library and information science research in Turkey: a content analysis of journal articles 1952-1994. IFLA journal, 26(1), 39-46.