Association of College & Research Libraries (2003). Principles and strategies for the reform of scholarly communication 1. White paper approved by the ACRL board of directors. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/ whitepapers/principlesstrategies
Borgman, C.L. (1989). Bibliometrics and scholarly communication. Communication Research, 16 (5), 583-599.
Borgman, C.L. (2000 a). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics revisited. In B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins (Ed.), The Web of knowledge: A festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Thomas H. Hogan, Sr.www.://Books.google.com
Borgman, C.L. (2000 b). Digital libraries and the continuum of scholarly communication. Journal of Documentation, 56 (4), 412 – 430.
Bruns, T., Brantley, J.S.; Duffin, K. (2015). Scholarly Communication Coaching: Liaison Librarians' Shifting Roles. (2015). Faculty Research & Creative Activity. Paper 99. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/lib_fac/99.
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Science of science and reflection. Translator by Yahya Emami. Tehran: Scientific Policy Research Center of Iran.
Calabrese, A. (1992). Changing time for scholarly communication: The case of the electronic journal. Technology in Society, 14, 199-220.
Cortez, P. (January 2011). Some Scholarly Communication Guidelines. Teaching Report, Department of information systems, Engineering School, university of Minho, Guimaraaes, Portugal.
https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/11599/ 1/scholar.pdf
Costa, C.; Meadows, J. (2000). The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science, 26 (4), 255–262.
Davies, J. E.; Greenwood, H. (2004). Scholarly communication trends-voices from the vortex: a summary of specialist opinion. Learned Publishing, 17 (2), 157-167.
Dehghani, Y., et al (2011). The study of scientific freedom among teachers in Shiraz university due to sociological variables. The programming Researches of Lesson I (2), 55-29.
Ehikhamenor, F.A. (1990). Informal scientific communication in Nigerian universities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41 (6), 419-426.
Etzkowitz, H.; Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university – industry – government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
Ezema, I. J. (2016). Scholarly Communication and Authorship Patterns in Language Research: Evidences from Citation Analysis of Language Theses in Nigeria. GJDS, 13 (2), 1-25.
Fazlollahi, S.; Maleki Tavana (2011). Solutions for overcoming the cultural barriers of science in universities. Marifat, 20 (171), 111-124.
Fjallbrant, N. (1997). Scholarly communication-Historical development and new possibilities .IATUL. http://www .iatul.org/doclibrary/public/Conf_Proceedings/1997/Fjallbrant.doc.
Frastkhah, M. (2003). Scientific freedom. Majlis & Rahbord (Majlis and Research), 10 (41), 101.-140.
Galyani-Moghaddam, G.; Momeni, E. (2014). Scholarly communication in Iran: An overview. Science Communication, 36 (6), 811-820.
Garvey, W.D.; Griffith, B.C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 3 (8), 123-126.
Ghaempour, M.A. (2015). Social and academic interactions in Sharif University students. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher education, 20 (4), 95-121.
Ghaneirad, M.A. (2003). The institutionalization of science, the maintenance and establishment of brains. Journal Management System (Rayaft), 12 (28), 71-86.
Ghaneirad, M. A. (2005). The development and the decadence of science in Iran (Islamic Career). Tehran: Science Organ, the Center of Scientific Politics in the Country.
Ghaneirad, M.A. (2006). Status of the scientific community in the social sciences discipline. Annually Nameh-Ye Olum-E Ejtemai, (27), 27-55.
Ghaneirad, M. A.; GaziPoor, F. (2002). The normative and institutional factors affecting the productivity of faculty members. Journal of cultural research, 7 (4), 167-206.
Harter, S.P. (1998). Scholarly communication and electronic journal: an impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (4), 507-516.
Holden, N. (1986). International scientific communication–old problems and a new perspective. R & D Management, 16 (3), 199-209.
Hurd, J. M. (2000). The Transformation of Scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (14), 1279-1283.
Kazemi, S., et al (2013). Paradigm governing special education from the perspective of the sociology of science. Quarterly Foundations of education (Studies in education & Psychology), 3 (1), 111-136.
Karimian, Z., et al (2012). Higher education administration and accountability; the necessity of autonomy and academic freedom from faculties’ viewpoint. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11 (8), 855-863.
Khosrowjerdi, M. (2008). Mapping the scientific communication network among scholars using “citation network” approach. Journal of Librarianship, 40 (45), 97-112.
Krejcie, R.V.; Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Kuhn, T.S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. ( A. Taheri, Trans.). Tehran: Geseh.
Kyvik, S.; Larsen, I. M. (1994). International contact and research performance. Scientomertrics, 29 (1), 161-72.
Liu, Z. (2003). Trends in transforming scholarly communication and their implications. Information Processing And Management, (39), 889-898.
Mahmood, I.; Hartley, R.; Rowley, J. (2011). Scientific communication in Libya in the digital age. Journal of Information Science, 37 (4), 379–390.
Menzel, H. (1964). The information needs of current scientific research. Library Quarterly, 34, 4-19.
Menzel, H. (1967). Planning the consequences of unplanned action in scientific communication. paper presented in symposium on communication in science: Paper presented in Symposium on Communication in Science: Documentation and Automation, eds. DeReuck, Anthony and J. Knight, 1996.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in Scientific Discovery, in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Norman Storer (ed.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Meyers, L.S.; Gamst, G.; Guarino, A.J. (2006). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mirzaei, S.A.E. (2007). Peer review process in science –research journal (a case study of Iranian journal of sociology). Quarterly Iranian Journal of Sociology in Iran, 7 (4), 147-179.
Mirzaei Aranjani, H. (1998). In Search of a theoretical design for understanding and analyzing the factors affecting work conscience and social discipline, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Practical Ways of Work Conscience and Social Discipline, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch.
Mirzaei Aranjani, H.; Moghimi, S. M. (2003). Presenting a desirable organization model for Iranian non-governmental organizations using entrepreneurial approach. Management Knowledge, (3), 101-138.
Mohammadi, A. (2008). The effects of scientific communication on knowledge production. Quarterly Iranian Journal of Sociology (ISA), 8 (1), 52-75.
Mukherjee, B. (2009). Scholarly Communication: A Journey from Print to Web. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 285. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/285.
Mulaudzi, P. (2005). Intercultural Communication: Problem or Solution within the New South African Context. Paper presented at humanities conference, 2005, University of Cambridge, Uk. Available at:
www.ho5.cgpubliser.com/proposals/758/index_html.
Nakhoda, M.; Horri, A. (2005). Factors affecting the application of information technology with emphasis on academic libraries: A literature review. Academic Librarianship and Information Research (Journal of Librarianship), 39 (43), 57-76.
Neshat, N. (2007). From episteme to idea. Tehran: Dama.
Nielsen, K. H. (2012). Scientific communication and the Nature of Science. Published online: 22 may, 2012 Sci & Educ DOI 10.1007/s11191-012-9475-3.
http://pure.au.dk/ portal/files/45699216 /nielsen2012 .pdf
Park, J.; Shim, J. (2011 ). Exploring How Library Publishing Services Facilitate Scholarly Communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43 (1), 76-89.
Pikas, C.K. (2006). The impact of information and communication technologies on informal scholarly scientific communication: A literature review. Prepared for LBSC878: Doctoral Seminar on Information Studies. Available:
http://terpconnect.umd.edu
Price, D.J. de Solla (1986). Little science, big science…and beyond. New York: Columbia University press.
Rahimi, M. (2007). The study of employment condition in producing the scientific works and affective factors aiming the scientific members of Mashhad University. M.A. Thesis of library and information, Psychology and treatment science university, Mashhad University.
Ronson, S.; Hinings, B.; Greenwood, R. (1980). The structuring of organizational structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (1), 1-7.
Solemani, M.R.; Ahokouei, A. (2008). The factors influencing the scientific productivity of the faculty members of the Islamic Azad University (Branch 8). Quarterly Curriculum Planning Knowledge & Research in Educational Sciences, (17-18). 119-146.
Xia, J. (2006). Scholarly Communication in East and Southeast Asia: traditions and challenges. IFLA Journal, 32(2): 104–112.
Xia, J.; Li, Y. (2015). Changed responsibilities in scholarly communication services: and analysis of job descriptions. Serial Review, 41 (1), 15-22.
Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the Invisible College. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2), 152-168.
)