Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 department of management. business group. university of chamran in ahvaz

2 university of Tehran.

3 university of ahvaz. iran. Ahvaz. faculty of management

4 university of chamran. management group

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Nowadays, public libraries by providing cultural, educational and scientific services to all groups of society, at urban and rural levels are considered as a main criteria for evaluating social welfare of nations. In analyzing social welfare criteria, the existence and extent of development of public libraries are in the range of housing, education, employment and health are considered as one of the indicators of the countries' development. Reaching more users and readers and increasing their willingness to re-visit the library lead to increases the efficiency of public resources. Every library needs to provide good, efficient and effective services, given the growing competition between information systems and the diverse needs of libraries, libraries need to place special emphasis on quality of service to attract more users. And improve productivity. However, the productivity of libraries is influenced by users' perceptions and experiences of evaluating the library environment, available facilities, collection size, staff attitudes, and reading activities in the library. Parasuraman (1988) proposed a comprehensive model to evaluate service quality that recognized as an important tools, to identification the difference in perceptions of service provided and expectations of the public libraries. A review of past studies in this area indicates that researchers have also used the SERVQUAL model to provide a framework for library service quality assessment. Given that quality of service is examined through several indicators and sub-indicators, it is very appropriate to apply multi-criteria decision-making techniques to evaluate service quality through SERVQUAL model. Among the multi-criteria decision-making techniques, the DEMATEL method successfully illustrates the internal relationships between variables. This study aimed to identify the indicators of service quality assessment among public and university libraries in Ahvaz based on the SERVQUAL model and then examine the internal relationships between indicators and sub-indicators.
Methodology: This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms data collection it's considered as a descriptive-exploratory. The statistical population of this study consisted of all supervisors and senior managers of public and university libraries in Ahwaz city with at least 10 years of experience and sufficient research experience. Using purposive sampling method, 45 people were selected and 31 of them were returned to correctly questionnaires, So that 13 people were from public libraries and 18 people were from libraries in universities. In this study, a questionnaire was used to measure the quality of librarian services. The questionnaire consists of 5 main indicators of the SERVQUAL model including tangibility, reliability, responsiveness, Assurance and empathy. Multi-criteria decision making techniques were used to analyze the data. All calculations for the DEMATEL method are performed using Microsoft Excel software features
Findings: The results showed that the indicators of empathy, tangibility and reliability are among the influential indicators, and the indicators of Assurance and Responsiveness are among the effectual indicators. All of the research indicators have impact on the responsiveness criteria, which indicates the importance of this criteria. Likewise, for each cluster all the calculations of the Casual and effectiveness of the components have been examined and the importance of each component has been calculated. In the indicator group, tangible sub-criteria (a4) " Materials associated with the services (such as pamphlets or statements) are visually ", In the Reliability subgroup (b3), "Library Suitable Services" and in the responsiveness index sub-criteria (c4) "Librarians are never too busy to respond to your requests" are considered the most influential indicators.
Discussion: Based on the results, the following research suggestions are offered to senior managers of public and university libraries in Ahvaz. Given the importance of the Assurance criteria, it is suggested that readers be provided with a sense of security when conducting exchanges with librarians so that librarians' behavior will improve a sense of trust in users and readers. Also, when librarians have sufficient knowledge to respond to readers and users, it improves the effectiveness of the Assurance components and ensures that readers will ultimately have a better assessment of the quality of service provided by the library. Responsiveness criteria is also very important. It is recommended that librarians provide services at a higher rate, giving users a sense that librarians are always looking to help them. Likewise, when responding to librarians without delay, it impacts and reinforces other components of responsiveness to ultimately give users and readers a better assessment of the quality of libraries.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Adeniran, P. (2011). User satisfaction with academic libraries services: Academic staff and students perspectives. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(10), 209-216.‏
Ahmad, M., & Abawajy, J. H. (2014). Digital library service quality assessment model. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 129, 571-580.‏
Awan, M. U., & Mahmood, K. (2013). Development of a service quality model for academic libraries. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 1093-1103.‏
Chang, C. C., & Wu, C. C. (2013, November). Multilevel analysis of work context and social support climate in libraries. In Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 65(6), 644-658. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Chen, I. S. (2016). A combined MCDM model based on DEMATEL and ANP for the selection of airline service quality improvement criteria: A study based on the Taiwanese airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 57, 7-18.‏
Chen, Y. T. (2016). Applying the DEMATEL approach to identify the focus of library service quality: A case study of a Taiwanese academic library. The Electronic Library, 34(2), 315-331.‏
Chen, Y. T., & Chou, T. Y. (2011). Applying GRA and QFD to improve library service quality. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 237-245.‏
Cheng, C. C., Chen, C. T., Hsu, F. S., & Hu, H. Y. (2012). Enhancing service quality improvement strategies of fine-dining restaurants: New insights from integrating a two-phase decision-making model of IPGA and DEMATEL analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1155-1166.‏
Cook, C., & Thompson, B. (2000). Reliability and validity of SERVQUAL scores used to evaluate perceptions of library service quality. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 26(4), 248-258.‏
Dahan, S. M., Taib, M. Y., Zainudin, N. M., & Ismail, F. (2016). Surveying users' perception of academic library services quality: A case study in Universiti Malaysia Pahang (UMP) Library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(1), 38-43.‏
Einasto, O. (2014). E-service quality criteria in university library: a focus group study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147, 561-566.‏
Jamali, R., & Tooranloo, H. (2009). Prioritizing academic library service quality indicators using fuzzy approach: Case study: libraries of Ferdowsi University. Library Management, 30(4/5), 319-333.‏
Kiran, K., & Diljit, S. (2012). Modeling web-based library service quality. Library & Information Science Research, 34(3), 184-196.
Lin, C. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert systems with applications, 36(6), 9683-9697.‏
Mohammad Beygi, Fatima. Hassanzadeh, Muhammad. (1388). Assessing the Quality of Public Libraries' Public Libraries Services in Qazvin Using the Lib Qualitative Tool, Payam Library Journal, Volume 15, Number 1: pp. 7-29.
Nitecki, D. A. (1996). Changing the concept and measure of service quality in academic libraries. The journal of academic librarianship, 22(3), 181-190.‏
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perc. Journal of retailing, 64(1), 12.‏
Patil, S. K., & Pradhan, P. (2014). Library promotion practices and marketing of Library services: A role of Library professionals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 249-254.‏
Pheng, L. S., & Rui, Z. (2016). SERVQUAL, the Kano Model and QFD. In Service Quality for Facilities Management in Hospitals (pp. 25-56). Springer Singapore.‏
Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., & Huang, K. K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277-282.‏
Tseng, M. L. (2009). A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert systems with applications, 36(4), 7738-7748.‏
Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.‏
Wu, Y. L., Tao, Y. H., Chang, D. Y., & Huang, T. M. (2015, September). The Dimensions of Service Quality at College Computer Center: Scale Development and Validation. In International Conference on Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research (pp. 381-392). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.‏ ‏
Zabed Ahmed, S. M., & Hossain Shoeb, Z. (2009). Measuring service quality of a public university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 10(1), 17-32.‏
Zhang, Y. L., & Bi, R. F. (2017). Studying on Enhancing Readers’ Satisfaction Model of Electronic Service Quality in Library Based on LibQUAL+ and Kano. Procedia Engineering, 174, 260-266.‏
Zoraghi, N., Amiri, M., Talebi, G., & Zowghi, M. (2013). A fuzzy MCDM model with objective and subjective weights for evaluating service quality in hotel industries. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 9(1), 38.