مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اشتراک نشریه

شرایط و ضوابط ارسال مقاله

فرم ها

راهنمای تنظیم مقاله

داوران

سنجش تأثیر فرهنگ سازمانی بر فرایند خلق دانش (نمونه‌پژوهشی: کتابخانه‌های عمومی کرمانشاه)

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترای علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی و مدرس گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی دانشگاه رازی

2 دکتری جامعه شناسی و مدرس گروه جامعه شناسی دانشگاه رازی

3 کارشناسی ارشد علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی دانشگاه رازی و کارشناس اداره کل کتابخانه های عمومی کرمانشاه

چکیده

هدف: هدف این مقاله تعیین میزان تأثیر انواع فرهنگ سازمانی بر اساس چارچوب ارزش های رقابتی کمرون و کویین بر خلق دانش در کتابخانه‌های عمومی کرمانشاه می‌باشد.
روش ­شناسی: پژوهش حاضر از نظر گردآوری داده‌ها پیمایشی است و از نظر سطح تحلیل، توصیفی است. جامعه پژوهش را مدیران و کارکنان اداره کل و کتابخانه‌های عمومی شهر کرمانشاه که تعداد آنان 87 نفر بود تشکیل داد. برای گردآوری اطلاعات مربوط به مبانی نظری و پیشینه پژوهش از روش‌های کتابخانه‌ای و برای پاسخگویی به سؤالات پژوهش از روش میدانی استفاده شد. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه بود. سؤالات در قالب پرسشنامه خلق دانش سازمانی و ابزار ارزیابی فرهنگ سازمانی در مقیاس لیکرت ارائه گردید. متوسط آلفای کرونباخ برای سنجش پایایی پرسشنامه خلق دانش 90/0 و پرسشنامه فرهنگ سازمانی 81/0 بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزارهای Excel، spss25 و  Amos استفاده شد.
یافته ­ها: بین فرهنگ سازمانی و خلق دانش با توجه به مقدار همبستگی چندگانه (83/0) رابطه مثبت و معنادار وجود داشت. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیونی نشان داد فرهنگ بازار و فرهنگ بومی با اثر رگرسیونی 8/22 بیشترین اثر را بر خلق دانش داشتند، مدل نهایی برازش شده دارای ضریب تعیین 70/0 بود. نتایج آزمون رتبه میانگین‌های فریدمن نشان داد فرهنگ سلسله‌مراتبی نسبت به سایر انواع فرهنگ از رتبه میانگین بالایی برخوردار بود و جهت توجه به سمت ترکیب و درونی‌سازی دانش بود. نتایج تجزیه مسیر نشان داد فرهنگ بازار ببیشترین اثر مستقیم بر خلق دانش داشت. فرهنگ بومی، فرهنگ ادهوکراسی و فرهنگ سلسله‌مراتبی اثر غیرمستقیم بر فرایند خلق دانش داشتند. با توجه به نتایج تجزیه مسیر چارچوب تجربی پژوهش ارائه گردید.
نتیجه­ گیری: فرهنگ بازار بیشترین تأثیر بر خلق دانش در کتابخانه‌های عمومی دارد. این نوع فرهنگ رقابتی و نتیجه‌گراست. سبک رهبری مبتنی بر رقابت سازنده و تأکید استراتژیک بر مزیت رقابتی و برتری در بازار است، لذا انطباق و سازگاری کتابخانه با محیط بیرون و سازگاری محیط با نیازهای سازمان ضرورت دارد. از سوی دیگر در رابطه با فرایند خلق دانش جهت توجه به سمت اجتماعی‌سازی و بیرونی‌سازی دانش است. این وضعیت با نظریه نوناکا و تاکوچی که بر اهمیت دانش پنهان در فرایند دانش‌آفرینی تأکید دارد و بیرونی‌سازی دانش را فرایند اصلی خلق دانش بیان می‌کنند، مطابقت ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

the Impact of Organizational Culture on the Knowledge Creation Process (Case Study: Kermanshah Public Libraries)

نویسندگان [English]

  • solyman shafee 1
  • daryosh ghafari 2
  • Mohsen Jafari 3

1

2 Lecturer, Department of Sociology, Razi University

3 M.A student in info science, Razi university

چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: Organizational knowledge creation is the process of making available and developing new knowledge as well as shaping and associating it with the organization's knowledge system. Some believe that the interaction between tacit knowledge and open knowledge is the source of knowledge creation, by which the quality and quantity of explicit and latent knowledge develops. The importance of culture in knowledge creation is for the great deal of knowledge that has been learned as a culture from previous generations. Therefore, organizations need to study organizational culture before undertaking knowledge management. Organization must understand the type of their culture in a typical business environment to consider the degree of appropriateness between the knowledge management issues and their culture. the purpose of this paper is to determine the impact of different types of organizational culture based on Cameron and Quinn's competitive values framework with knowledge creation process in Kermanshah Public Libraries.
Methodology: The present study is a survey in terms of data collection and a descriptive research in terms of analectic level. The study sample consisted of managers and staff of Kermanshah General Department and Public Libraries with 87 members. According to Krejcie and Morgan table, the sample size was 70 people. Fifty-one sample members (equals 73% of the sample) answered the questionnaire. Data collection was done by both library and field methods. Library methods were used to gather information on the theoretical foundations and background of the research and the field methods were used to respond to research hypotheses. We used a questionnaire to collect data. The questions were presented using the Likert scale of organizational knowledge creation questionnaire and organizational culture assessment tool. Cronbach's alpha for the reliability of the knowledge creation questionnaire was 0.90 and for the organizational culture questionnaire was 0.81. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to describe and analyze the data. Descriptive statistics were collected from central tendency indices and dispersion indices such as frequency, percentage of frequency, mean, variance and standard deviation to express the data. Pearson's correlation coefficient, multiple regression, Friedman's mean rankings, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and path analysis were used to answer the research hypotheses. SPSS 25, and AMOS were used for data analysis.
Findings: The results of Friedman mean rank test showed that the mean of hierarchical culture was 5.26, native culture was 5.15, adhocracy culture was 4.55 and market culture was 4.3. Therefore, hierarchical culture had the highest rank and market culture had the lowest rank. Multiple correlation coefficient (0.83) indicated a positive and significant relationship between organizational culture and knowledge creation. The results of regression analysis showed that market culture and native culture with regression effect of 22.8 had the greatest effect on knowledge creation and the final fitted model had a coefficient of determination of 0.70. The results of the study of knowledge conversion status showed that it is oriented towards the composition and internalization of knowledge. Path analysis results showed that market culture had the most direct effect (0.79) and adhocracy culture had the least indirect effect (0.55). Native culture, adhocracy culture and hierarchical culture had an indirect effect on the process of knowledge creation. Based on the results of path analysis, an experimental framework was presented.
Discussion: The results show that the organizational culture in Kermanshah Public Libraries was 0.72 effective on the knowledge creation process. This result indicates that there is a supportive culture in Kermanshah Public Libraries for scientific activities. Therefore, the existing organizational culture as the personality and foundation of the organization plays an effective role in establishing knowledge management. Kermanshah Public Libraries must first identify its organizational culture and implement knowledge management programs in line with the existing organizational culture in order to effectively create and disseminate knowledge across the organization. Among the types of organizational culture, market culture has the most influence on knowledge creation in public libraries which is a competitive and resultant culture and the leadership style is based on productive competition and strategic emphasis on competitive advantage and market superiority. the adaptation of the library to the environment and adaption of the environment to the organization needs seem to be essential. In the process of knowledge creation, the attention should be upon the composition and the internalization of knowledge. This was not in line with the theory of Nonaka which emphasized the importance of tacit knowledge in the process of knowledge creation, and that externalizing knowledge was the main process of knowledge creation. This research is limited to public libraries, so other libraries should be studied to increase the generalizability of results. On the other hand, the present study has assessed the relationship between the knowledge creation process and organizational culture based on a set of attitudes, so in different societies witch have different cultures, future research must be done to be able to extend the results to other societies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge management
  • Knowledge Creation
  • Organizational Culture
  • Parsons Framework
  • Nonaka & Takuchi Knowledge Management Model
مراجع
Abbasi, Zohreh; Parrikh, Mehri and Fatahi, Seyed Rahmatollah (1389). Identifying the Organizational Culture Pattern Governing Central Libraries of Universities and Measuring Its Impact on Knowledge Management Implementation. Information Science and Technology, 25. (Persian)
Alavi, M. kayworth, T.R. & Leidner, D.E. (2006). The role of culture in knowledge management: A case study of two global firms. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 2 (1): 17-40.
Asare, Farideh, Maruti, Zarkaleh & Hosseini, Seyedeh Maryam (1392). The Relationship between Cultural Intelligence and Knowledge Management Case Study: Khuzestan Public Libraries. Information Systems and Services, 2 (4), 42-33. (Persian)
Ba, L. (2004). Knowledge management and organizational culture: a social action perspective, (doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, 2004). Retrieved from proquest diss Wickramasinghe, N. knowledge creation, in D. G.
Bratianu, C., & Orzea, I. (2010). Organizational knowledge creation management. Marketing challenges for knowledge society, 5 (3), 41-62.
Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework, reading, MA: addison-wesley.
Chin-Loy, C., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2007). The Influence of organizational culture on the success of knowledge management practices with North American companies. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 6 (3), 15-28.
Choi, B, Lee, H. (2002). Knowledge management strategy and its link to knowledge creation process. Expert Systems with Applications, 23, 173–187.
Choi, B. (2002). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination, (doctoral dissertation, Korea advanced institute of science and technology).
Ciganke, A. P., Mao, E., & Srite, M. (2008). Organizational culture for knowledge management systems: a study of corporate users. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 4(1), 1-16.
Dalkir, K. Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. UK: Elsevier Inc.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.
De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(4), 113-127.
Du Plessis, M. (2006). The impact of organizational culture on knowledge management. Oxford: chandos publishing.
Fiol, C.M. & Lyles, M.A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of management review, 10 (4): 803-813.
Gottschalk, P. (2005). Strategic Knowledge Management Technology, USA: idea group Inc.
Gray, J. H., Densten, I. L. (2005). Towards an integrative model of organizational culture and knowledge management. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 9 (2), 594-
603.
Hassanzadeh, Mohammad (1386). Knowledge Management: Concepts and Infrastructure, Tehran: ketabdar. (Persian)
Herschel, R. & Yermish, I. (2009). Knowledge management in business intelligence, in W. R. king (Ed.), knowledge management and organizational learning, New York: Springer.
Holsapple, W. C. (2004). Complete knowledge management reference. Translated by Seyyed Jalal Mousavi, Abu Ghrael Malik Much, Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini Mons. Tehran: noavar.
Intezari, A., Taskin, N., & Pauleen, D. J. (2017). Looking beyond knowledge sharing: an integrative approach to knowledge management culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(2), 492-515.
Janhonen, M. & Johanson, J. (2011). Role of knowledge conversion and social networks in team performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 217–225.
Kangas, L. M. (2005). An assessment of the relationship between organizational culture and continuous knowledge management initiatives. Capella University.
Karppinen, M. (2006). Cultural patterns of knowledge creation: Finns and japanese as ngineers and poets, (doctoral dissertation, helsinki school of economics, 2006).
Kaur, V., Kahlon, R., & Randhawa, S. (2012). Conceptual framework of relationship between Knowledge management and Organizational culture. Gyan Jyoti E-Journal, 1(2).
Kohi Rostami, Mansour; Haji Zeinolabedini, Mohsen and Negar Mori, Bakhtiar (1398). The impact of social capital mediated by organizational culture on the feasibility of knowledge management deployment in Khuzestan public libraries. Library and Information Science Studies (under print). (Persian)
Koloniari, M., Vraimaki, E., & Fassoulis, K. (2019). Factors affecting knowledge creation in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(1), 20-33.
Lee, H. & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20 (1), 179-228.
Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California management review, 40(3), 112-132
Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2010). Analyzing ict adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: an empirical investigation in smes. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 521–528.
Lwanga, N. E., & Ngulube, P. (2019). Nexus between reward culture and knowledge creation in selected academic libraries in Uganda. South African Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1-8.
Mohammad Fateh, Asghar ؛ Sobhani, Mohammad Sadegh and Mohammadi, Dariush (1387). Knowledge management, a holistic approach. Tehran: payam poya. (Persian)
Naghipour, Majid; Fereydoon, Azadeh; Dargahi, Hossein; Ghazi Mirsaeed, Seyed Javad; A Survey of Organizational Culture and Organizational Structure in relation to the Application of Knowledge Management in Central Libraries of Medical Sciences Universities. Payavard salamat, 2 (3), 49-42. (Persian)
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1996). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Long range planning, 4(29), 592.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how japanese campanies create the dynamics of innovation. UK: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I, Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow: a process theory of the knowledge-based firm. USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nonaka, I, Umemoto, K., & Senoo, D. (1996). From information processing to knowledge creation: a paradigm shift in business management. Technology in Society, 18 (2), 203-218.
Oyemomi, O., Liu, S., Neaga, I., Chen, H., & Nakpodia, F. (2019). How cultural impact on knowledge sharing contributes to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 94, 313-319.
Parsons, T. & Shils, E. A. (Eds). (1951). Toward a general theory of action: theoretical foundations for the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pauleen, D., & Mason, D. (2002). New Zealand knowledge management survey: barriers and drivers of KM uptake. 
Pentland, B. T. (1995). Information systems and organizational learning: the social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 5(1), 1-21.
Prado-Gascó, V., Pardo, I. Q., & Pérez-Campos, C. (2017). Knowledge management and organizational culture in a software development enterprise. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 27(1), 37-50.
Prusak, L. (2001). Where did knowledge management come from? IBM systems journal, 40(4), 1002-1007.
Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond rational management: mastering paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Josset-Bass.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management science, 29(3), 363-377.
Rahimi Farajollah Zaranjad, Mansour and Bakhshi Zadeh, Alireza (1391). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Culture on the Knowledge Creation Process: An Experimental Research Based on the Parsons Framework. Journal of Executive Management, 4 (8), 13-40. (Persian)
Rocher, G. (1975) Talcott parsons and American sociology, New York: Barnes & Noble.
Roman-Velazquez, J. (2005). An empiric study of organizational culture types and their relationship with the success of a knowledge management system and the flow of knowledge in the U.S. government and nonprofit sectors, in stankosky, M. (Ed.), creating the discipline of knowledge management: the latest in university research .New York: Elsevier Inc.
Ruggles, R. (1998). The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice. California management review, 40(3), 80-89.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Career anchors. San Diego: University Associates.
Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. USA: Wiley.
Tong, C., Tak, W. I. W., & Wong, A. (2015). The impact of knowledge sharing on the relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction: The perception of information communication and technology (ICT) practitioners in Hong Kong. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 5(1), 19.
Tseng, S. (2010). The correlation beetween organizational culture and knowledge conversion on corporate performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (2), 269-284.
Waltz, E. (2003) Knowledge management in the Intelligence enterprise, London: Artech House, Inc.
Wickramasinghe, N. (2006). Knowledeg Creation. In D. G. Schwartz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management (Pp. 326-335). Hershey, Pa: Idea Group, Inc.
Xie, Y. (2009) an empirical analysis of the antecedents of knowledge management strategies, (doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, 2009). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertationdatabase. (UMI No. 3379108).
Zawaraqi, Rasul and Abbaszadeh, Ruqiyya (1396). Investigating the Cultural Barriers of Knowledge Management Deployment in University Libraries: A Case Study of Tabriz Libraries and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 3 (51), 135-111. (Persian)
Zheng, w. (2005). The impact of organizational culture, structure, strategy on knowledge management effectiveness and organizational effectiveness. PhD, university of Minnesota.
مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات
دوره 14، شماره 2
مرداد 1401
صفحه 61-83
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار