Identifying the Status of Organizational Experiences Documentation at Research Centers and Institutes

Zamani, Asghar

doi:10.22055/slis.2020.30923.1647

Document Type : Original Article

Author

asghar zamani

Faculty member, Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2020.30923.1647

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In today’s knowledge society, it is vital to use the experiences gained by directors and chancellors of organizations and their experts for Succession and educating new directors. But unfortunately, in higher education and especially in research centers and institutes, despite the important role of experience, it is neglected to document experiences and the tacit knowledge inherent in experiences for several reasons such as: lack of culture of writing, vagueness of the concept of organizational experience, lack of a proper method for documentation and sharing it, and lack of legal and supportive infrastructure. Accordingly, efforts should be made to extract accumulated knowledge in the minds of Chancellors and deputies of research centers and institutes, by documentation of experiences, so it will be possible to share knowledge and experience among new Chancellors and deputies. Therefore, the knowledge stored in research centers and institutes become a permanent usable resource. Based on this, the study by examining the status of organizational experiences documentation of Chancellors and deputies of research centers and institutes, develop a model for this important issue.The purpose of this study was to identify the status of documenting the organizational experiences of research institutes and centers, using mixed-method.
Methodology: This research is developmental and applied research. In this research, according to the subject and nature of the research, the research method was mixed method and exploratory. In qualitative section, interview was used for data gathering. The questions of interview selected through literature review and consultation with some experts. It is notable that the interviews were semi-structured. Participants in qualitative section were experienced experts (Chancellors and deputies of research centers and institutes), theoretical experts (experts in the field of higher education), and experts in the field of experiences documentation. Some participants were experts in two or three fields of expertise. After implementing the interviews, an open coding method was used to analyze the qualitative data. Then, by calculating the reliability and validity, based on the gathered data, a questionnaire was developed. In the next phase, validity and reliability (by calculating Cronbach’s alpha) of questionnaire were confirmed and the questionnaire sent to the statistical population of the study (including all Chancellors and deputies, Heads of Offices of Chancellors and deputies, and Heads of Public Relations in research centers and institutes affiliated by the Ministry of Science and Technology and Research). Also, in quantitative phase, descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to analyze the collected data.
Findings: The results indicated that men had more positive attitude toward documenting their experiences than women, and the attitude of those with more than 10 years of service experience was better than those with less than 10 years of service. The existing status of research institutes was also negative in terms of documenting the experience in the true sense, but documenting approvals and consultations based on experiences in council meetings was partly done. Concerning the sharing of tacit knowledge and experiences is also the central focus of the individual factors of the members of research institutes to share organizational knowledge and experience with colleagues. Internal and external factors play a supporting role in the sharing of tacit knowledge and experience, and faculty member is the ultimate decision-maker in tacit knowledge sharing based on his or her own knowledge abilities and individual and personality factors.
Discussion: According to the results, if Ministry of Science, Research and Technology would like to document organizational experiences, and to avoid trial and error at research institutions, it is suggested that the real will for documentation of experiences be developed in Higher Education Directors. Also, policy and legal and judicial issues in this regard be developed. The issue be emphasized at the summit of heads of universities and research institutes. The Ministry of Science send an announcement and call for documentation of organizational and management documentation; however, due to the issues such as university autonomy and academic features, it cannot be treated in a cohesive manner. Also, it is suggested that the Ministry of Science establish the necessity for policy and supportive, legal and legal infrastructure, and, if necessary, requests it from the three branches of the powers and takes the necessary approvals. It is suggested that the issue of documentation of organizational experience be included in the appointment of all chancellors of research institutions. Through the Board of Trustees, the subject of documentation of organizational experiences be cited as mission or vision. Finally, it is suggested to set up supportive and incentive laws (such as financial or spiritual, promotion laws, etc.) to support documentary makers and users of experiences.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Knowledge Management

References

Afrazeh, A. (2008). Knowledge management (concepts, models, measurement and implementation). (Second Ed.). Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology. (In Persian)

Atashgar, K. (2015). “A Structural Traceability Approach to Explicate Knowledge Focusing on Know-how”, International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations. 4(44), 31 – 39.

Bigdeli, F. (2011). Providing a model for documenting the experiences of public and private school principals of Abadan city, with the knowledge management approach. MSc thesis. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (In Persian)

Chitale, C. M. (2012). Collaborative knowledge sharing strategy to enhance organizational learning. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 308-322.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V .L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. and Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–30.

Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge management in theory and practice. United State of America: The MIT Press. 2 Ed.

Davari, A. (2000). Documentation of internal partnership in power plant construction. Tehran: Institute for Management Research and Training. (In Persian)

Dori, B. (2005). Documenting managers' experiences. Research Project, Ministry of Education. Educational Research and Planning Organization.

Dori, B. and Mahmoud Salehi, M. (2010). Experience management, basics, approaches, and methods of applying experience management. Tehran: Saramad.

Duncan. V. (1998). Knowledge of Project Management. Translated by Hamid Aladpoush. Tehran: Hami Publications. (In Persian)

Elahi, Sh., Azar, A., and Rajabzadeh, A. (2005). Designing Model of Organizational Experience. Daneshvar Raftar, 8, 65-78. (In Persian)

Eslamian, M. (2008). Designing and Developing a Model for Documenting Experiences of Managers of Shahid Beheshti University. MSc thesis. Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian)

Jafari Moghadam, S. (2010). Documenting managers' experiences from knowledge management perspective. (3rd Ed.). Tehran: Institute for Management Research and Training. (In Persian)

Kibe, L. & Kwanya, T. (2015). Knowledge Ambassadors: Enhancing Tacit Knowledge Transfer in Kenyan Universities. In International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations (pp. 794-805). Springer, Cham

Kibet, K.S. (2010). Knowledge Management as a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantages. African Journal of Buisness Management, 1: 82.

Landes, D., Schneider, K. & Houdek, F. (1999). Organizational learning and experience documentation in industrial software projects. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 51, 643-661.

Li, X. Zhou, C. & Hu, H. (2014). "From craftsman’s control to managerial control-A research on tacit knowledge explicitation in scientific management," Science and Technology Management Research, pp.193-204.

Mehralizadeh, Y. (2009). Modern Management Theories: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (In Persian)

Mehralizadeh, Y. and Abdi, M.R. (2011). Knowledge Management System, Experience of the Iranian National Tax Administration. (1st Ed.). Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. (In Persian)

Mohammadraei, S., Shami Zanjani, M., MusaKhani, M. (2014). Identifying and Ranking Guidelines for the Successful Deployment of Knowledge Management Models Using APQC. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 3(1), 62. (In Persian)

Molaei, M. (2011).Knowledge Management Model for managing Knowledge among Related Organizations. Available at:http://www.waset.org/

Mousavian Najaf Abadi, S.R., Siadat, S. & Hoveida, R. (2014). Identifying Documentation Methods and Experiences (Professional) Transference of Experienced Faculty Members and Less Experienced Ones in the University of Isfahan. Educational Research International, 3(3), 1-10.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create The Dynamices of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

O'Dell, C. and C. Hubert. 2011. The new edge in knowledge: How knowledge management is changing the way we do business. New York, USA: Wiley

Shokrzadeh, S., (2012). Designing a Model of Human Resource Development Based on Knowledge Management System in Knowledge-Based Organizations (Case Study: Atomic Energy Organization of Iran). PhD Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian)

Tavallaee, R. & Rashidi, M.M. (2011). A Practical Framework for Documentation of Experience and Knowledge Acquisition of Experts in Organization. International Conference on Business and Economics Research. IACSIT Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Todorović, M.L; Petrović, D.C; Mihića, M. M; Obradović, V. Lj; Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). “Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management”, International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772–783.

Weldy, T. G. & Gillis, W. E. (2010). The learning organization: variations at different organizational levels. The Learning Organization, 17 (5): 455-470.

Wu, M. Lin, H. Lin, Y. & Chang, W. (2013).A study on the tacit knowledge of university faculty: a case study.in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review. 14: 171-188.

Zamani, A. (2015). Developing a Model for Documenting Organizational Experiences of Heads of public Universities in Iran. PhD Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University.

Zamani, A. (2016). Qualitative Analysis of Principles of Documenting the Organizational Experiences of University Directors. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 35, 201-228.

Zamani, A., Ghahramani, M., Tofiqi, J. and Abolghasemi, M. (2014). Documenting the Experiences of University heads, A Necessity in Academic Knowledge Management. Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 27, 7-34

Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science

Identifying the Status of Organizational Experiences Documentation at Research Centers and Institutes

References

References

Volume 11, ُSpecial Issue: Knowledge Management
November 2019
Pages 123-144

Identifying the Status of Organizational Experiences Documentation at Research Centers and Institutes

References

References

Volume 11, ُSpecial Issue: Knowledge ManagementNovember 2019Pages 123-144

Volume 11, ُSpecial Issue: Knowledge Management
November 2019
Pages 123-144