مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات

ارائه مدل ساختاری-تفسیری عوامل تأثیرگذار بر اشتراک دانش در محیط‌های دانشگاهی.

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

علی بیرانوند 1
ساره رحمانیان 2
علی رضا محمدی نژادگنجی 3
مسعود ایروانی 4

1 استادیار، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 مربی، گروه مدیریت، دنشگاه پیام نور، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی واحدکرج، ایران.

4 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی. دانشگاه پیام نور. ایران.

https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2021.38824.1861
چکیده
هدف. شناسایی مدل عوامل تأثیرگذار بر اشتراک دانش در محیط‌های دانشگاهی همواره از اهمیت و جایگاه خاصی در میان تحقیقات حوزه مدیریت دانش برخوردار بوده است. هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل ساختاری-تفسیری عوامل مؤثر بر اشتراک دانش در محیط‌های دانشگاهی از دیدگاه اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام‌نور می‌باشد.

روش. این پژوهش بر اساس هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش گردآوری اطلاعات، توصیفی-پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری تحقیق شامل اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه می‌باشند که با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری قضاوتی19 نفر از خبرگان مطلع و صاحبنظر در حوزه مدیریت دانش که دارای سوابق علمی، تجربی یا پژوهشی بودند، به عنوان اعضای پنل خبرگان انتخاب شده‌اند. روش‌های گردآوری اطلاعات در این پژوهش به دو دسته کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی(پرسشنامه) تقسیم می‌شود. در این پژوهش، از تکنیک دلفی فازی جهت غربال متغیرها و از مدل‌سازی ساختاری-تفسیری برای شناسایی و طراحی الگوی روابط بین شاخص‌‌ها استفاده شده است.

یافته‌ها. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده، متغیرهای خودکارآمدی، پشتیبانی مدیریتی، سیستم پاداش، سیاست‌های کلان دانشگاه، زیرساخت‌های نرم افزاری، زیرساخت‌های سخت‌افزاری، تعامل شخصی،اعتماد، انتظارات شخصی، استفاده از رسانه‌های اجتماعی، تمایل به اشتراک‌گذاری دانش، کارکنان دانشی و فرهنگ دانش‌محور به عنوان عوامل مؤثر بر اشتراک دانش در دانشگاه پیام‌نور معرفی گردید. نتایج حاصل حاکی از آن است که سیاست‌های کلان دانشگاه، پشتیبانی مدیریتی و فرهنگ دانش محور، تأثیرگذارترین عوامل می‌باشند. متغیرهای خودکارآمدی و کارکنان دانشی تأثیرپذیرترین عوامل شناسایی شده در این تحقیق می‌باشند.

اصالت و ارزش. تاکنون تحقیق مشابهی به بررسی روابط درونی و بیرونی، تعیین سطوح تأثیرگذاری و تأثیر‌پذیری عوامل مؤثر در اشتراک دانش در دانشگاه پیام نورنپرداخته و تحقیق حاضر از این نظر دارای نوآوری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مدیریت دانش
اشتراک دانش
انگیزه اشتراک گذاری دانش
مدل ساختاری-تفسیری
دانشگاه پیام نور
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a structural-interpretive model of factors affecting knowledge sharing in academic settings.

نویسندگان English

Ali Biranvand 1
Sareh Rahmaniyan 2
Alireza Mohammadi Nejad Ganji 3
Massoud Irvani 4
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Iran.
2 Instructor of Department of Management, Payam Noor University, Iran
3 Assistant Professor,, Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Iran.
4 MA. Department of Knowledge and Information Science. Payame Noor University, Iran.
چکیده English

Background and Objectives: Knowledge application describes the practical use of knowledge that has been created, absorbed, and put into the knowledge management cycle. An important factor in knowledge management is knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions is a very important process. Universities play a significant role in the progress of societies by producing, storing, and disseminating knowledge through innovative and applied research. Academics, as agents of knowledge production and dissemination in society, must have the necessary motivation to share knowledge. Motivation is crucial for all knowledge-based work. Knowledge sharing is the core of innovation in universities and higher education institutions, as knowledge is shared specifically to improve organizational performance. Since knowledge sharing is voluntary, the process depends on the willingness of the individuals involved and involves active communication, dialogue with colleagues, and effective collaboration. Universities should seek ways to transfer knowledge from experts to non-experts in a timely manner. The process of knowledge transfer and knowledge sharing requires executive support to motivate employees. Knowledge sharing allows universities and higher education institutions to exploit knowledge-based assets. Universities and higher education institutions in developing countries such as Iran should prioritize knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing preserves the knowledge of experienced academics and utilizes it. Therefore, knowledge sharing will be a vital part of the university's overall mission to advance the goals of society. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively identify the factors affecting knowledge sharing and analyze the levels of influence and impact of the identified variables in order to create a suitable context for strengthening knowledge management in universities. Accordingly, the present study has examined the factors affecting knowledge sharing among staff and academic members of Payam Noor University in order to answer the question in a theoretical dimension: what does knowledge sharing mean in universities and what factors affect it? And in a methodological dimension, it will answer the question: what are the cause-effect relationships and levels of influence and impact of factors affecting knowledge sharing among staff and academic members of universities?
Methodology: Considering the main objective of this research, which is to explain the factors affecting knowledge sharing in universities, the present research is an applied research in terms of purpose and an exploratory research in terms of method. The statistical population of the research includes the faculty members of Payam Noor University. Using judgmental (purposive) sampling, 19 knowledgeable and opinionated experts in the field of knowledge management were selected as members of the expert panel with the following criteria: having sufficient expertise and experience, and deep knowledge of the research topic. The data collection method in this research is divided into two categories: library and field (questionnaire). In the library section, the results of previous research were studied. In this study, 15 indicators (including: self-efficacy, management support, reward system, university macro policies, intra-organizational relations, software infrastructure, hardware infrastructure, personal interaction, participatory management, trust, personal expectations, use of social media, willingness to share knowledge, knowledge workers, knowledge culture) were identified in three factors: individual, organizational, and technology. In the second stage, these indicators were evaluated using the fuzzy Delphi method. In the third part of the research, the structural-interpretive modeling technique was used to identify and design the pattern of relationships between the indicators.
Findings: Based on the results, the variables of self-efficacy, managerial support, reward system, university macro policies, software infrastructure, hardware infrastructure, personal interaction, trust, personal expectations, use of social media, knowledge sharing tendency, knowledge staff, and knowledge-based culture Introduced as effective factors on knowledge sharing in Payame Noor University. The results indicate that macro-university policies, managerial support, and knowledge-based culture are the most influential factors. Self-efficacy and knowledge staff variables are the most influential factors identified in this study
Discussion: So far, no similar research has examined the internal and external relations, determining the levels of influence and effectiveness of the effective factors in knowledge sharing in the university, and the present study is innovative in this regard.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Knowledge management
Knowledge Sharing
Motivation to share knowledge
structural-interpretive modeling
Payame Noor University
Akosile, A., & Olatokun, W. (2019). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among academics in Bowen University, Nigeria. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 52(2), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618820926
Alhawary, F. A., Abu-Rumman, A. H., & Alshamaileh, M. O. (2017). Determinant factors of knowledge sharing among academic staff in the Jordanian universities. European Journal of Social Sciences 55(4), 415–426. http://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com/
Al-Kurdi, O., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2018). Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2017-0129
Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., & Stuedemann, R. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650139
Azar, A., Tizro, A., Moqbel Ba'arz, A., & Anavari Rostami, A. A. (2021). Modeling the agility of supply chain using interpretive structural modeling approach. Management Research in Iran 14(4), 1–25. https://mri.modares.ac.ir/article_126.html?lang=fa
Biranvand, A., Golshani, M., Akbarnejad, R., & Rafiee, Z. (2021). The role of organizational trust in the transfer of tacit knowledge (case study: Public libraries of Fars Province). Research on Information Science and Public Libraries 27(2), 327–358. http://publij.ir/article-1-2327-fa.html
Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing. MIS Quarterly. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2017245.2017251
Bousari, R. G., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2012). Factors that affect scientists’ behavior to share scientific
knowledge. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 6(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2012.10700935
Cai, Y., Tang, R., & Zhou, L. (2025). Relationship between supervisor support and teachers’ knowledge-sharing behaviors: The role of satisfaction of teachers’ basic psychological needs and trust in supervisors. Journal of Knowledge Management 29(7), 2105–2128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2023-0374
Cheng, M.-Y., Ho, J. S.-Y., & Lau, P. M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: A study of Multimedia University Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 7(3).
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(3), 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: Managing what your organization knows. Harvard Business School Press.
Donnelly, R. (2019). Aligning knowledge sharing interventions with the promotion of firm success: The need for SHRM to balance tensions and challenges. Journal of Business Research 94, 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.007
Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710762684
Empson, L. (2001). Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination: Impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms. Human Relations 54(7), 839–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726701547003
Endres, M. L., & Chowdhury, S. (2019). Team and individual interactions with reciprocity in individual knowledge sharing. In Effective Knowledge Management Systems in Modern Society (pp. 123–145). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5427-1.ch007
Fauzi, M. A., Nya-Ling, C. T., Thurasamy, R., & Ojo, A. O. (2019). Knowledge sharing: Role of academics towards research productivity in higher learning institution. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2018-0074
Fauzi, M. A., Nya-Ling, C. T., Thurasamy, R., Ojo, A. O., & Shogar, I. (2019). Muslim academics’ knowledge sharing in Malaysian higher learning institutions. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0111
Fauzi, M. A., Tan, C. N. L., Thurasamy, R., & Ojo, A. O. (2019). Evaluating academics’ knowledge sharing intentions in Malaysian public universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 24(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol24no1.7
Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & McLean, J. (2018). Exploring the factors that influence knowledge sharing between academics. Journal of Further and Higher Education 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1448928
Gaal, Z., Szabo, L., Obermayer-Kovacs, N., & Csepregi, A. (2015). Exploring the role of social media in knowledge sharing. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 13(3).
Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal 15(S2), 91–112. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v15y1994is2p91-112.html
Gillani, S. M. F., Iqbal, S., Akram, S., & Rasheed, M. (2018). Specific antecedents of employees’ knowledge sharing behavior. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2017-0023
Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210417664
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge management’s social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. MIT Sloan Management Review 42(1), 71. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/knowledge-managements-social-dimension-lessons-from-nucor-steel/
Hendriks, P. H. J. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management 6(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1441(199906)6:2
Huemer, L. (1998). Knowledge and the concept of trust. In G. Von Krogh, J. Roos, & D. Kleine (Eds.), Knowing in firms (pp. xx–xx). Sage.
Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review 2(4), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303257985
Ishrat, R., & Rahman, W. (2019). Factors of knowledge sharing: A literature review. Sarhad Journal of Management Sciences 5(2), 219–254. Retrieved from http://journal.suit.edu.pk/index.php/sjms/article/view/410
Jolaee, A., Nor, K. M., Khani, N., & Yusoff, R. M. (2014). Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0041
Kaffashan Kakhki, M., Hadadian, A., Namdar Joyame, E., & Malakooti Asl, N. (2020). Understanding librarians’ knowledge sharing behavior: The role of organizational climate, motivational drives and leadership empowerment. Library & Information Science Research 42(1), 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100998
Kaushal, S., & Nyoni, A. M. (2025). Why do rewards fail to motivate knowledge sharing behavior among employees? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 55(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-06-2022-0202
Khademizadeh, S., Farajpahlou, H., & Haidarizadeh, A. (2019). Comparison investigating of knowledge sharing status and factors affecting it among faculty members of the faculty of veterinary medicine and basic sciences of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz and faculty of basic sciences of Jundishapur University of Ahvaz. Journal of Library and Information Science Studies 26(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2018.24928.1448
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50(1), 569–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569
Liang, T.-P., Liu, C.-C., & Wu, C.-H. (2008). Can social exchange theory explain individual knowledge-sharing behavior? A meta-analysis. ICIS 2008 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/171
Lin, H.-F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science 33(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068174
McDermott, R., & O’Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384428
Mugo, M. W. (2018). Influence of information and communication technology on knowledge sharing in research organizations: A case of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Kenya (Master’s thesis). Strathmore University.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
Nguyo, P. M., Kimwele, M. W., & Guyo, W. (2015). Influence of ICT on knowledge sharing in state corporations in Kenya: A case of the Kenya National Library Service. International Academic Journal of Information Systems and Technology 1(4), 1–21. http://www.iajournals.org/articles/iajist_v1_i4_1_21.pdf
Nisar ul Haq, M., & Haque, M. (2018). Investigating the knowledge sharing among students in Pakistan. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 7(1(s)). Retrieved from http://european-science.com/eojnss_proc/article/view/5345
Noor, A. D., Hashim, H. S., & Ali, N. (2014). Factors influencing knowledge sharing in organizations: A literature review. International Journal of Science and Research 3(9), 1314–1319. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SEP14397
Saad, A. (2013). A case study of academics’ knowledge sharing motivations at Malaysian public academic institutions. Journal of Education and Vocational Research 4(9), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v4i9.130
Sahraian, K., Biranvand, A., & Ghobadi Azad, E. (2025). The effect of the motivation of regulatory focus on the process of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding. Library and Information Science Research 15(1), 207–228. https://infosci.um.ac.ir/article_45651.html?lang=en
Sarvestani, M. S., Biranvand, A., & Shojaeifard, A. (2022). Organisational trust and tacit knowledge transfer. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 42(5), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.42.5.18312
Schulz, M. (2017). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069409
Stenmark, D. (2000). Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11045655
Supar, N. (2012). Technological factors affecting knowledge sharing among academic staff in selected Malaysian higher educational institutions and the effect on performance. Journal of Education and Vocational Research 3(7), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i7.73
Tohidinia, Z., & Mosakhani, M. (2010). Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors. Industrial Management & Data Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011039052
Vuong, D. C. H., & Staples, D. S. (2008). Sharing knowledge in voluntary service not-for-profit organizations. In ASAC (Vol. 29).
Wei, J., Zheng, W., & Zhang, M. (2011). Social capital and knowledge transfer: A multi-level analysis. Human Relations 64(11), 1401–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711417025
Weiss, L. M. (1999). Collection and connection: The anatomy of knowledge sharing in professional service firms. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.1999.27613308
مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات
دوره 17، شماره 2
تابستان 1404
صفحه 41-58

صفحه اصلی

ارسال مقاله

هزینه های بررسی مقاله

تماس با ما

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

همکاران نشریه