چیستی و چرایی تاریخ دانش مدون: مطالعه ریشه‌ها و فایده‌ها

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی/ دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 عضو هیأت علمی گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه

3 عضو هیات علمی گروه تاریخ. دانشگاه ایلام

چکیده
چکیده:

هدف: این تحقیق اصطلاح و مفهوم تاریخ دانش ثبت شده و اهمیت مطالعه و بررسی آن را با هدف درک موضوع معرفی می کند. جایگاه تاریخ در کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی چیست؟ چرا از اصطلاح سابقه دانش ثبت شده برای این رشته تحصیلی استفاده می شود؟ چه نیازی به تحقیق در این زمینه است؟

روش تحقیق: روش این مقاله نظری و تحلیلی است و از اصطلاحات ، ریشه شناسی و تحلیل تاریخی استفاده از اصطلاحات و مفاهیم استفاده می شود. این تحقیق بین رشته ای است.

یافته‌ها: خاستگاه و ریشه تاریخ دانش مدون و مفاهیم مربوطه به دست آمده و لزوم استفاده از اصطلاح تاریخ دانش مدون برای نامگذاری این زمینه و مفهوم تاریخ دانش مدون با استفاده از نظرات متفکران بیان گردیده است. در زبان سومری DUb، به معنی لوح است. واژه‌های، دبیر، دبیرستان، دبستان، دیبا، دیبه، دیباچه، دیوان مشتق از آن است. بنابراین اصطلاح «مدون» به معنی در دیوان گرد آمده دارای ریشه‌ای کهن است و دانش مدون در لغت به معنی دانشی است که در جایی جمع آورده شده و نوشته و به نحوی حفظ شودهمچنین فایده‌ها و مزایای تاریخ دانش مدون در این مقاله نشان داده شده است.

بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: خاستگاه دانش مدون و اصطلاح مربوطه از تمدن بین‌النهرین بوده و واژگان دانش و مدن نیز از اصطلاحات بسیار قدیمی و ریشه‌دار بوده و تاریخ دانش مدون زمینه مهم تاریخ فرهنگی است که در رشته علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی مطالعه می‌گردد. این مفهوم با اصطلاحات دیگری پیش از این مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است و در این پژوهش به رسایی و پختگی اصطلاح تاریخ دانش مدون پرداخته شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Quiddity & why of recorded knowledge history: Study the roots and benefits

نویسندگان English

behzad mohamadyari 1
Gholamreza Haidary 2
siavash yari 3
1 PHD student of information science and universology /shahid chamran university of ahvaz
2 Member of the Department of Information Science and knowledge , Razi University of Kermanshah
3 Member of history department. Ilam University
چکیده English

Review:

Objective: This research introduces the term and concept of recorded knowledge history and the importance of studying and examining it with the aim of understanding the subject. What is the place of history in librarianship and information? Why the term Recorded knowledge history used for this field of study? What is the need for research in this field?

Research Method: The method of this article is theoretical and analytical and terminology, etymology and historical analysis of the use of terms and concepts are used. This research is interdisciplinary.

Findings: The origin and roots of the Recorded knowledge History and related concepts have been obtained and the necessity of using the term Recorded knowledge history to name this field and the concept of the history of Recorded knowledge has been expressed using the opinions of thinkers. Also, the benefits and advantages of Recorded knowledge history are shown in this article. "Dabir" is a Sumerian word that originated in the Persian language from the Achaemenid period and was used in the form of DP, and DUb, meaning is tablet. The words, Divan aand Modavan derived from it. Therefore, the term "Modavan" means that it has ancient roots in the depths of history, and Recordeded Knowledge in the word means knowledge that is collected and written somewhere and preserved in some way.

Discussion and Conclusion: The origin of Recorded knowledge and related term is from Mesopotamian civilization and the words knowledge and civil are very old and deep-rooted terms and the Recorded knowledge history is an important field of cultural history that is studied in the field ofLIbrary and information science. This concept has been studied with other terms before and in this research the accessibility and maturity of the term written history has been discussed. The study of the Recorded knowledge History brings achievements for Library and information science and links with other sciences that deal with social and cultural studies. Examining this important part of human history acquaints young and popular scholars with an aspect of Library and information science and its attractions, and creates pleasure in readers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Recorded Knowledge
Recorded Knowledge History
Book History
Information History
Aristotle (1997). Metaphysics. Translation: Sh. Khorasani. Tehran: Hekmat. [In Persian]
Azakai-‌Spitman, P. (2005). Scientific classification in bibliography (critique of current thematic classes). Librarianship. Archives And Manuscript Research: Islamic books, 24‌(25), 7-16. [In Persian]
Azarang, A. (1999). A Selected Articles on Book Publishing in Iran. Tehran: Ketabdar. [In Persian]
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2000). “A distant mirror? The internet and the printing press”. Aslib Proceedings. Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 51- 7.
Behnam, A. (2001). The Firsts in Library and Information Sciene. Tehran: Chapar. [In Persian]
Black, A. (1998). Information and modernity: the history of information and the eclipse of library history. Library history, 14(1), 39-45.
Black, A. (2006). Information history. In Cronin, B. (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, Vol. 40, Information Today, Medford, NJ.
Buckland, M., & Liu, Z. (1998). History of information science. Historical Studies in Information Science, 1998, 272-295.
Dahl, S., & Barthou, L. (1960). Histoire du livre: de l'antiquité à nos jours. Paris: Jules Lamarre.
Dehkhoda, A. A. (1996). Loghatnameh, below the entry of Modavan. Tehran: University of Tehran, Dehkhoda Institute. [In Persian]
Eastwood, D. (1989). Amplifying the province of the legislature: the flow of information and the English state in the early nineteenth century. Historical Research, 62 (149), 276- 94.
Ebrami, H. (2003). Introduction to Librarianship and Information Science. Tehran: Ketabdar. [In Persian]
Ennis, P. H. (1964). The study of the use and users of Recorded knowledge. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 34(4), 305-314.
Fani, K., & Akrami, M. (2008). History of science and technology in Iran in a conversation with Professor Kamran Fani and Dr. Musa Akrami. Book of the Month of History and Geography, 125. [In Persian]
Hashemian Bojnourd, N., & Minhaj, M. B. (2007). What is knowledge? Literature review, comparison of definitions, presentation of a new definition. Approach Quarterly. [In Persian]
Headrick, D.R. (2000). When information came of age: Technologies of knowledgein the age of reason and revolution, 1700-1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Homayoun Farrokh, R. A. (1965). History of Iranian libraries and public libraries. Tehran: Tehran Municipality Public Libraries Organization. [In Persian]
Jenkins, K. (2004). Rethinking history. Translated by S. Sadeghian. Tehran:  Nashre Markaz. [In Persian]
Khandan, M. (2009). Philosophy of Information. Tehran: Chapar; General Libraries. [In Persian]
Kilgour, F. G. (2004). The evolution of the Book. Translated by  A. Shakoee. Tehran: Dabizesh Publications. [In Persian]
Mahmoudzadeh, M. (2016). A Critique of Economic Research in Iran: Popper's Theory of Three Worlds. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policy, 24(78), 97- 120. [In Persian]
Makinen, I., Black, A., Kovac, M., Skouvig, L.,  & Torstensson, M. (2005). Informationand Libraries in an Historical Perspective: From Library History to Library and Information History, draft report of the EU Curriculum development Project.
Marvin, C. (1987). Information and history. In Slack, J. & Fejes, F. (Eds), The Ideology of the Information Age. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 49- 62.
Meggs, P. B. (2005). Graphic design date. Translation By  Gh. Fathilanoori & N. Azamferasat. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
Nekounam, J. (2003). Library research method with emphasis on islamic sciences, especially for writing journalism in postgraduate courses. Qom: Qom University Press. [In Persian]
Popper, C. R. (1973). Freedom and the theory of the three worlds (negation of causation is not enough). Translated by Ahmad Aram. Kian Magazine, 9, 1- 9. [In Persian]
Popper, C. R. (1995). Objective cognition of evolutionary perception. Translated by Ahmad Aram. Tehran: Sherkate Entesharate Elmi wa Farhangi. [In Persian]
Rahadoust, B. (2007). Philosophy of library and information science. Tehran: Ketabdar. [In Persian]
Ranjbari, M. (2001). Developments In book publishing in the seventies (2000-2001). Tehran: Book House Institute. [In Persian]
Rasekhonia, P. (2001). Several timelines in information and communication. Tehran: Khane Ketab. [In Persian]
Rismanbaf, A. (2010). Historical neglect of historical information science studies: Consequences and review of new efforts. Journal of Library and Information Science, 15(4), 9-37. [In Persian]
Ritchie, S. (1982). Modern library practice. ELM Publications, Kings Ripton.
Samaran, C. (1996). Research methods in history. Translation of Abolghasem Bighonah and others. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Islamic Research Foundation. [In Persian]
Sarafrazi, A. (2010). The role of persian printed indian newspapers in the iranian constitutional revolution. Quarterly Journal of Subcontinental Studies, Sistan and Baluchestan University, 2(2). [In Persian]
Sarukhani, B. (2007). Research methods in social sciences. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
Stanford, M. (2005). An introduction to research history. Translation: M. Sadeghi. Tehran: Samt; Center for Research and Development of Humanities, Imam Sadegh (AS) University, Vice Chancellor for Research. [In Persian]
Weller, T. (2005). A new approach: the arrival of informational history. Proceedings of the XVI International Conference of the Association for History and Computing, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, 14-17 September.
Weller, T. (2006). A continuation of Paul Grobstein’s theory of science as storytelling and story revising: a discussion of its relevance to history. Journal of Research Practice, 2(1), available at: http://jrp.icaap.org/content/v2.1/weller.html
Weller, T. (2008). Information History: Significance, status and future. Translated by R. Mokhtarpour. Monthly Etelayabi & Etelarasani, 15, 20- 32. [In Persian]
Weller, T., & Bawden, D. (2005). The social and technological origins of the information society: an analysis of the crisis of control in England, 1830- 1900”. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 777- 802.
Weller, Tony. (2007). information history: its importance, relevance and future. Journal Aslib Proceedings, 59, 437- 448.
Yorland, B. (2002). Documents, Guardian Institutions, and Information Science. In A. Bahmanabadi, A. Radbaveh (eds).  In  fundamentals, history and philosophy of information science (excerpts of articles), Tehran: National Library of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]