عوامل مؤثر بر دریافت استناد در پایگاه کلاریویت آنالیتیکز از دیدگاه متخصصان علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی: مطالعه‌ای دلفی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه پیام نور

2 استادیار گروه علم اطلاعات ودانش شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور

3 کتابدار اداره کل کتابخانه های عمومی استان همدان

چکیده
هدف: در این پژوهش عوامل مؤثر بر دریافت استناد مقالات در پایگاه کلاریویت آنالیتیکز از دیدگاه متخصصان رشته علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی شناسایی شده است.

روش: روش پژوهش حاضر دلفی بوده که با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای متون، مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر دریافت استناد استخراج‌ و بر اساس این مؤلفه‌ها پرسشنامه‌ای تهیه گردیده است. پایایی آن از طریق آلفای کرونباخ 711/. تعیین گردید و روایی پرسشنامه توسط متخصصان مربوطه تعیین‌شده است. جامعه‌ی پژوهش شامل متخصصان رشته علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی که 30 نفر در دور اول و 20 نفر در دور دوم در پژوهش مشارکت داشته‌اند

یافته‌ها: یافته‌های به‌دست‌آمده با استفاده از روش دلفی به ارائه 70 مؤلفه فرعی پیشنهادشده در زیر پنج مؤلفه‌های اصلی ویژگی‌های حوزه موضوعی، مجله، مقاله، نویسندگان و کلیدواژه‌ها انجامید. که 9 متغیر زیرمجموعه مؤلفه حوزه موضوعی، 13 متغیر زیرمجموعه مؤلفه ویژگی‌های مجله، 21 متغیر از زیرمجموعه مؤلفه ویژگی‌های مقاله، 16 متغیر از زیرمجموعه مؤلفه ویژگی‌های نویسندگان و 11 متغیر از زیرمجموعه مؤلفه ویژگی‌های کلیدواژه ازنظر متخصصان موضوعی تأثیرگذار بر دریافت استناد شناسایی شدند.

نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج نشان می‌دهد که پژوهشگران در استناد به مقالات بیشتر به اعتبار ناشر، وسعت حوزه‌ها و رشته‌ها، اعتبار مؤسسه یا دانشگاه، تعداد مجلات علمی در آن رشته، اعتبار ابعاد انتشار مجله، ضریب تأثیر مجله، بین‌المللی بودن انتشار مجله و شاخص Q مجله، ، زبان مجله، شکل نشر و ارائه، تخصصی بودن مجله دسترس‌پذیری مقاله، نوع دسترسی ، مقالات با موضوعات جدیدتر و جذاب‌تر، اعتبار منابع و مأخذ در یک مقاله، تاریخ انتشار مقاله، شهرت نویسندگان، حضور در شبکه‌های اجتماعی علمی، ایجاد یک رزومه آنلاین مانند ORCID و ارتباط موضوعی مقاله، محبوبیت موضوعی، تعداد کلمات کلیدی و مانند آن اهمیت و توجه نشان می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

effective factors on reciveing citations in Clarivate Analytics Database from the Perspectives of specialists in the field of Knowledge and Information Science: A Delphi Study

نویسندگان English

Faramarz soheili 1
Ali Akbar Khasseh 2
mojgan sadeghi 3
1 Payame Noor University
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Library and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
3 کتابدار
چکیده English

Abstract

Objective: In this research, the factors affecting the number of citations to the articles indexed in the Clarivate Analytics have been identified from the perspective of Library and Information Science specialists.

Method: The method of the present study is Delphi. By conducting a content analysis of the texts, the components affecting the number of citations have been extracted and a questionnaire has been designed based on these components. The research community is composed of Library and Information Science specialists.

Findings: The findings from the Delphi method led to the identification of 70 proposed sub-components under the five main components including the characteristics of the subject area, journal, article, authors and keywords.

Conclusion: The results of this study show that researchers, when deciding to cite articles, pay more attention to the following factors: publisher credibility, scope of fields and disciplines, credibility of the institution or university, credibility of journal publication dimensions, journal impact factor, the international publication of the journal and its Q index, article accessibility, type of access, authors reputation, presence in scientific social networks, having an online resume such as ORCID, article topic relevance, topic popularity, and number of keywords.

Finally, the following factors are among the features that, according to the Library & Information Science faculty members, are not related to receiving citations of articles, and for this reason, they were removed in the first stage of Delphi: the length of the article, the length of the abstract, the name of countries in the title, the presence of time in the title, the type of titles, the use of figures and appendixes in the articles, the sample size of the article, the length of the article title, the presence of the name of a place in the title, articles with more notes, articles with punctuation marks in the title, the presence of acronyms and abbreviations, providing detailed contact information of authors, the number of authors, and the number of self-citations of authors.

Keywords: citation, received citation, citation rate, factors affecting number of citations, Clarivate Analytics, Library and Information Science.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

received citation
citation rate
factors affecting number of citations
Clarivate Analytics
Library and Information Science
Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective strategies for increasing citation frequency. International Education Studies, 6 (11), 93-96. (in Persian)
Alimoradi, F., Javadi, M., Mohammadpoorasl, A., Moulodi, F. & Hajizadeh, M. (2016). The effect of key characteristics of the title and morphological features of published articles on their citation rates. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63 (1), 74-77. (in Persian)
Annalingam, A.; Damayanthi, H.; Jayawardena, R. & Ranasinghe, P. (2014). Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. Springerplus, 3 (1), 140.
Antoniou, G. A., Antoniou, S. A., Georgakarakos, E. I., Sfyroeras, G. S., & Georgiadis, G. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 29 (2), 286-292.
Ayres, I., & Vars, F. E. (2000). Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 427-450.
Bornmann, L., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Daniel, H. D. (2012). What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? Journal of Informetrics, 6 (1), 11-18.
Buter, R. K., & van Raan, A. F. (2011). Non-alphanumeric characters in titles of scientific publications: An analysis of their occurrence and correlation with citation impact. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 608-617.‏
Cheek, J., Garnham, B., & Quan, J. (2006). What's in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research(ers). Qual Health Res, 16(3), 423–435.
Cho, J. (2021). Altmetrics analysis of highly cited academic papers in the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, 126 (9), 7623-7635.
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013a). Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 861-873.
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013b). Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1055-1064.
Falagas, M. E., Zarkali, A., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Bardakas, V., & Mavros M. N. (2013). The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PloS One, 8(2), 1-8.
Falahati Qadimi Fumani, M. R., Goltaji, M., & Parto, P. (2015). The impact of title length and punctuation marks on article citations. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 62(3), 126-132.
Feizabadi, M., Vaziri, E., Haseli, D. (2017). Analysis of the Factors Influencing Citations in Systematic Reviews of Medical Research in Iran. Journal of Health Administration, 2(68), 86-98. (in Persian)
Ghayouri, Z., & Hasanzadeh, M. (2015). Effective Solutions to Attract the Audience to the Public Libraries of Iran: Delphi Study. Library and Information Science Research, 6(2), 206-226. (in Persian)
Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., Thijs, B., & Schubert, A. (2006). A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy. Scientometrics, 67(2), 263-277. ‏
Haslam, N., Ban, L., Kaufmann, L., Loughnan, S., Peters, K., Whelan, J., & Wilson, S. (2008). What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics, 76(1), 169-185.
Horri, A. (1998). The Necessity and Significance of Using Foregin Information Sources in Iranian Investigations. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 8(4), 7-12. (in Persian)
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., &  de Oliveira, J. H. C. (2013). The perception of brazilian researchers concerning the factors that influence the citation of their articles: A study in the field of sustainability. Serials Review, 39(2), 93-96.
Jamali, H. R., & Nikzad, M. (2011). Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics, 88(2), 653-661. (in Persian)
Lund, B. D., & Maurya, S. K. (2020). The relationship between highly-cited papers and the frequency of citations to other papers within-issue among three top information science journals. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2491-2504.
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer
Nazarian, S., Atapour, H., & Noroozi Chakoli, A. (2012).  High Citation of Iranian Coauthored articles in comparison with single authored ones: Does it link with self-citation. Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 4(27), 960-945. (in Persian)
Onodera, N., & Yoshikane, F. (2015). Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 739-764.
Osareh, F. (1998). Citation analysis. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 9(43), 34-45. (in Persian)
Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. (1994). On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 39.
Rostami, F., Mohammadpoorasl, A., & Hajizadeh, M. (2014). The effect of characteristics of title on citation rates of articles. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2007-2010. (in Persian)
Sahoo, J., Mohanty, B., Biswal, O., Dash, N. K., & Sahu, J. K. (2020). Authorship trend and content analysis: A case study on highly cited articles in library and information science journals. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 21(1), 33-51.
Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2017). The effect of keyword repetition in abstract and keyword frequency per journal in predicting citation counts. Scientometrics, 110(1), 243-251. (in Persian)
Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195-1225. (in Persian)
Tang, Y., Tseng, H., & Vann, C. (2020). Unwrap citation count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8/9), 653-664.
Uddin, S., & Khan, A. (2016). The impact of author-selected keywords on citation counts. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1166-1177.
van Leeuwen, E., van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 679-690.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(1), 50-62.