Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz , Ahvaz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Department of Knowledge and Information Science , Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between the altmetrics metrics of the Altmetrics Explorer database and the citation indexes of the articles in the scientific productions of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
Methodology: This research is of an applied type, which was carried out with a scientometric approach and using altmetrics indicators. The research data extraction source for each of the data will be as follows: the altmetrics indices of the articles were extracted from the Altmetrics Explorer database through the metrics provided for the articles. The academic productions of the faculties were also separated based on the organizational affiliation of the authors, and the correlation of the tested indicators at the level of the faculties was also measured in order to determine the difference between the scientific fields. Research data search strategy: The scientific productions of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz were retrieved from the Scopus database with the following strategy and within the range of 2000 to 2020 and the type of research articles, reviews, letters to the editor and editorials.
 AFFIL ("Shahid Chamran University" OR "University of Shahid Chamran" OR "Shahid Chamran University or Ahwaz" OR "Shahid Chamran University or Ahwaz" OR "Shahid Chamran of Ahwaz University" OR "Shahid Chamran of Ahwaz University" OR "Shahid Chamran Ahwaz University" OR "Shahid Chamran Ahwaz University" OR "Ahwaz Shahid Chamran University" OR "Ahwaz Shahid Chamran University") AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2000-2020)) AND (LIMIT-TO (DOCTYPE , "ar" OR "re" OR "ed" OR "le")) AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBSTAGE, "final"))
In this database, the Altmetrics Attention Score is a measure of the amount of attention that a research output (such as an article) has attracted. The source of extracting this data includes the following:

Blogs, Dimensions Citation Data, Facebook, Faculty Opinions (formerly F1000), News and Mainstream Media, Mendeley, Patents, Policy Documents, Q&A Forums (Stack Exchange), Reddit, Twitter, Web of Science Citation Data, Wikipedia, YouTube, Syllabi (open syllabus)

 
 

In order to determine the relationship between these measures and reference indicators, correlation test was used. Statistical analyzes were performed in order to determine the correlation values and determine the influential component/components using SPSS software.

Findings: According to the results of the research in the entire scientific production of the university, there is a significant relationship between the total number of citations and the reference metrics of articles in policy sources, patents, Wikipedia, and Mendely, as well as citations in the Dimensions database (P-value<0.01). The relationship of FWCI index with Altmetrics total score and reference in news sources is significant with P-value<0.05 and with reference in Mendeley and citations in Dimentions database with P-value<0.01. Also, there is a significant relationship between the FWCI percentile with Mendelian reference scale and citations in Dimensions database with P-value<0.01.
Discussion: It is necessary for researchers to identify the path and methods of introducing articles in scientific databases and social networks (after the publication of the article or its publishable version) from these portals in order to increase the amount of use and, as a result, the citation of their articles.The expansion of social media and their importance in establishing scientific communication and disseminating research findings necessitates the need for new indicators in addition to traditional indicators for evaluating research. In the current study, out of 5501 retrieved articles, 735 articles were present in the Altmetrics Explorer database. In the entire scientific production of the university, there is a significant relationship between the total number of citations and the citation metrics of articles in policy sources, patents, Wikipedia, and Mendeley, as well as citations in the Dimensions database. The relationship between the FWCI index and the Altmetrics total score and mentions in news sources and mentions in Mendeley and citations in Dimensions database is significant. Also, there is a significant relationship between the FWCI percentile with Mendelian reference scale and citations in the Dimensions database. At the level of faculties, there was a relationship only in some indicators. Also, considering that some types of these networks, such as patents, are only applicable to some scientific fields, it is necessary to be identified by the research officials of universities and faculties, general social networks or specific scientific fields of the faculty. and to introduce articles in these databases and scientific networks. It is also necessary for researchers to identify the path and methods of introducing articles in scientific databases and social networks (after the publication of the article or its publishable version) from these portals in order to increase the amount of use and, as a result, citation of their articles. make it desirable

Keywords

Main Subjects

Wouters, P., Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control: Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Utrecht: SURF foundation. Retrieved September 20, 2012 from: http://www.surffoundation.nl/nl/publicaties/Documents/Users%20narcissism%20and%20control.pdf
Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. (2013). Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE.8(5): e64841.
Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P. (2014). How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. Scientometrics. 101(2):1491–1513.
Bornmann L. (2014). Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime. Journal of Informetrics.8(4):935–950.
Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11): e47523
Nip, Isabel, and Hao Feng. 2022. “Examining Correlation of Altmetric Score and Citation Number in Dermatology Journal Articles.” Journal of Dermatological Treatment 33(1): 297–99.
Tang, Yingqi, Hungwei Tseng, and Charlcie Vann. 2020. “Unwrap Citation Count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley Readership Status of Highly Cited Articles in the Top-Tier LIS Journals.” Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 69(8–9): 653–64.
Rong, Lisa Q. et al. 2020. “Examining the Correlation between Altmetric Score and Citation Count in the Anaesthesiology Literature.” British Journal of Anaesthesia 125(2): e223–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.086.
Banshal, Sumit Kumar, Vivek Kumar Singh, and Pranab Kumar Muhuri. 2020. “Can Altmetric Mentions Predict Later Citations? A Test of Validity on Data from ResearchGate and Three Social Media Platforms.” Online Information Review 45(3): 517–36.
Black, Colin S., Daniel J. Lehane, Chris Burns, and Brian D. O’Donnell. 2018. “An Examination of the Effect of Open versus Paywalled Access Publication on the Disseminative Impact and Citation Count of Publications in Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia.” Journal of Critical Care 46: 88–93.
Ezema, Ifeanyi Jonas, and Cyprian I. Ugwu. 2019. “Correlating Research Impact of Library and Information Science Journals Using Citation Counts and Altmetrics Attention.” Information Discovery and Delivery 47(3): 143–53.
Chi, Andrew J. et al. 2021. “Examining the Correlation between Altmetric Attention Score and Citation Count in the Gynecologic Oncology Literature: Does It Have an Impact?” Gynecologic Oncology Reports 37: 100778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2021.100778.
Ayoub, Fares et al. 2021. “Dissemination of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research on Social Media Platforms Is Associated with Increased Citation Count.” The American Journal of Gastroenterology 116(10): 2137–39.
Lehane, Daniel J., and Colin S. Black. 2021. “Can Altmetrics Predict Future Citation Counts in Critical Care Medicine Publications?” Journal of the Intensive Care Society 22(1): 60–66.
Niazmand, Mohammad Reza; Ebrahimi, Saeeda and Jokar, Abdul Rasul. (2016). A comparative study of the use of social networks by researchers in the Middle East countries, Science, 9 (34), 101-111. [In Persian].
Ismailpour Bandbani, Mohammad; Betoli, Zahra; Ramezani, Abuzar; Ranjbar Pirmossi, Zulikha and Ramezani Pakpourlangroudi, Fatemeh. (2016). Evaluation of Altmetric indicators in the number of citations to Gilan University of Medical Sciences articles, Health Information Management, 13 (5), 367-372. [In Persian].
Mansoorkiai, Rababe; Bab al-Hawaeji, Fahmia; Noushinfard, Fatemeh and Sohaili, Faramarz. (2018). Evaluation of the spread of scientific articles by researchers of information science and scientology in the world in social networks; Journal of Scientific Research, 4(1), 161-179. [In Persian].
Sarati Shirazi, Mansoura. (2019). Altmetric study of Iranian articles indexed in Social Sciences Index, Information Management Sciences and Techniques, 5(4), 162-190. [In Persian].
Sarati Shirazi, Mansoura and Gol Taji, Marzieh. (2018). Altmetric study of scientific articles in the field of "health literacy" in social media. Paish, 17(3), 249-256. [In Persian].
Ehtsham, Hamida; Sadeghi, Halima; Vahedi Madhim, Faeza and Amiri, umm al-Binin. (2019). Analyzing the altmetrics indices of Birjand University of Medical Sciences articles included in the Scopus database using the PlumX tool: a scientometric study. [In Persian].
Biranvand, Ali and Shanbadi, Zahra. (2020). Investigating the altmetrics indicators resulting from the activities of the most productive Iranian authors and researchers in the field of nursing in scientific social networks. Library studies and information science. [In Persian].