Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 MSc. Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Prof, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22055/slis.2021.37648.1843

Abstract

Background and Objectives:  Given that information is the basis of decisions and actions in organizations and these actions affect the success of the user of the information (individual or organization) (Mcleod, 1995). Therefore, evaluating the quality of information should be considered by organizations from the stage of preparation to its maintenance. Therefore, addressing the design and operation of technical documentation information systems and also using indicators to evaluate the quality of information of this type of information systems and technical documentation archived in it can be a solution to produce quality information and produce sustainable and quality technical documentation of the organization. Guarantee. Evaluating information systems Technical documentation is a mission that leads to providing quality and stable information in organizations, including knowledge-based companies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of information in technical documentation information systems of knowledge-based companies located in Khuzestan Science and Technology Park, in order to achieve quality evaluation criteria for preparing and maintaining information in technical documentation and providing a model for information managers in Khuzestan Science and Technology Park.
Methodology: The data collection method of the present study is descriptive-survey. This research is in terms of purpose of applied studies and in terms of method is among the mixed research. Due to the concurrence of qualitative and quantitative methods in this research, the simultaneous mixed method is considered for this research. In the qualitative part of the research, the analytical approach of historiography and in the quantitative part, the descriptive-survey method have been used.  In the qualitative section, the statistical population includes all key specialists and those who are familiar with technical documentation information systems and have worked and experienced in this field, and based on expertise, were selected by purposive sampling method. The statistical sample of the present study in the qualitative section is the interview of 10 experts in information systems and technical documentation of science and technology parks in Khuzestan province. In this study, due to the need for key information resources in this field, the snowball sampling method (Patton, 2002) has been used. Sampling continued until we achieved saturation in the collected information. In the qualitative section, semi-structured interview tools were used to collect data. In order to present the model of the present study, by reviewing the documents that have been done in the research (Khademizadeh, Faraj Pahlo, and Ghasemizadeh ,2020), the interview protocol has been designed and in-depth interviews have been performed based on it. In the quantitative part of the present study, a questionnaire was used to collect data. . This questionnaire is based on the "CISE" model. In this research, two questionnaires have been used for experts and managers of the documentation department. The experts' questionnaire has 18 items that have been designed on a five-point Likert scale, and the documentation of the managers of the documentation department included 8 items with a nominal scale. The present study population is companies located in Khuzestan Science and Technology Park, which according to the latest statistics provided in 2019 are about 164 companies. Among these companies, 44 active companies that had a long history in the field of documentation and management and other scientific fields related to documentation, participated in this survey and 32 experts with regard to the background and expertise in documenting activities as Statistical sample completed the research questionnaire. In addition to this sample, 11 managers in whose company the documentation activity is performed by the documenter information system, participated in this study. In the qualitative part, the data obtained from the interview and the analysis of documents were analyzed as content analysis by deductive coding method. In the quantitative part, the analyzes of this research have been done at two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics.
Findings: The findings of the present study showed that the quality of preparation and maintenance of technical documents in the information systems of Khuzestan Science and Technology Park in the statistical community with an average higher than 3, is moderate and desirable. Findings show that all four indicators studied in the present study include accessibility, quality, durability and maintenance; They are in a good position by earning a score higher than the standard score of 3.
Discussion: In general, it can be concluded that the use of technical documentation management in all types of organizations, especially project-based organizations has a positive effect on information quality.

Keywords

Abdulwahed, M., Ahmad, S., Hasna, M. O., Ghani, S., & Benammar, M. (2014, December). Contribution of Shell Eco-Marathon engineering design experience to soft skills development: A qualitative analysis in the Asian context. In 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 424-431). IEEE.‏
Ahmad, A. R., Jameel, A. S., & Raewf, M.  (2021). Impact of Social Networking and Technology on Knowledge Sharing among Undergraduate Students. International Business Education Journal, 14(1), 1-16. DOI:10.37134/ibej.vol14.1.1.2021 (In Persian)
Bakker, R., & Kanellos, N. (2013). Exploring the characteristics of nowledge-Based Entrepreneurship in Greek high- technology sectors. DRUID Academy Conference. Corpus ID: 167905835
Balven, R., Fenters, V., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. (2018). Academic entrepreneurship: The roles of identity, motivation, championing, education, work-life balance, and organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0127
Bandera, C., Keshtkar, F., Bartolacci, M. R., Neerudu, S., & Passerini, K. (2017). Knowledge management and the entrepreneur: Insights from Ikujiro Nonaka's Dynamic Knowledge Creation model (SECI). International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(3), 163-174. DOI:10.1016/j.ijis.2017.10.005
Brennan, M. C., & McGowan, P. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(3), 144-164. DOI:10.1108/13552550610667431
Byrne, O., & Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Different strokes for different folks: Entrepreneurial narratives of emotion, cognition, and making sense of business failure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 375-405. DOI: 10.1111/etap.12046
Chandra, S., & Kumar, K. N. (2018). Exploring factors influencing organizational adoption of augmented reality in e-commerce: empirical analysis using technology-organization-environment Model. Journal of electronic commerce research, 19(3).‏
Criado-Gomis, A., Cervera-Taulet, A., & Iniesta-Bonillo, M. A. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurial orientation: A business strategic approach for sustainable development. Sustainability, 9(9), 1-20. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i9p1667-d112402.html
Daniali DahHovz, M., HatamiNesab, S. H., & Zaree, E. (2011). Knowledge entrepreneurship and organizational innovation and performance. Journal of Business Management2(10), 57-85. (In Persian)
Davidavičienė, V., Al Majzoub, K., & Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. (2020). Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Teams. Sustainability, 12(17), 6917. DOI:10.3390/su12176917
Dong, Y., Bartol, K. M., Zhang, Z. X., & Li, C. (2016). Enhancing employee creativity via individual skill development and team knowledge sharing: Influences of dual‐focused transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(3), 439-458. DOI:10.1002/job.2134
Esmaeilifarsani, M., abazari, Z., & Hariri, N. (2020). Effect of knowledge management on knowledge entrepreneurship among faculty members of information science in Iran. Journal of Knowledge Studies13(48), 1-12. (In Persian)
Feghahati, P., & Talebbeydokhti, A. (2015). Investigating the relationship between knowledge sharing on organizational innovation with considering the media of organizational learning (Case Study: General Directorate of Shahid Bahonar Bandar Abbas), Second International Conference on Economics, Management, Accounting with the Value Creation Approach, Shiraz. (In Persian)
Garg, P., & Zhao, M. (2018). Knowledge sourcing by multidivisional firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3326-3354. DOI:10.1002/smj.2956
Ghaffari, K. (2014). Investigating the factors affecting the acceptance of the organization's resource planning system in the cloud environment. AlZahra University, Tehran. (In Persian)
Harvey, L. & Knight, P. (1996). Defining and Measuring Employability. In Google Retrieved 05/03/2012; www.tanfronline.com/abs/10.1080.
Harvey, L., & Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Open University Press, Taylor & Francis. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=199049
Heshmati Rafsanjani, H. H. (2015). An interpretive study of the co-creation of knowledge in an online community. University of Manchester, Manchester.https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/
an-interpretive-study-of-the-co-creation-of-knowledge-in-an-onlin. (In Persian)
Ismaili Behbahani, S. (2015). Investigating factors affecting the implementation of mobile customer relationship management based on the TOE model. University  of Bandarabas, Hormozgan. (In Persian)
Kamal, N., Ali, B., & Samdani, H. (2020). The Competencies and Knowledge Entrepreneurship relationship in Higher Education Institutes: Examining the Moderating role of Organizational Climate. Global Social Sciences Review, 5(1), 390-398. (In Persian)
Kanellos, N. S. (2013). Exploring the characteristics of Knowledge-Based Entrepreneurship in Greek high-technology sectors. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 13(1), 69-88. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.060
Katebi, A., Homami, P., & Najmeddin, M. (2021). EAcceptance model of precast concrete components in building construction based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Technology, Organization, and Environment (TOE) framework. Journal of Building Engineering, 45, 103518. DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103518.(In Persian)
Khalifelu, M. (2017). Evaluation of the components of strategic thinking and the weighted impact of its dimensions on knowledge entrepreneurship and organizational agility among teachers in Nair city. Ardabil New Higher Education Institute, Ardebil. (In Persian)
Khorakian, A., Jahangiri Fayzabadi, M., Forutan, M., & Dehghan Benadaki, M. (2015). The impact of knowledge management on innovation through moderating organizational factors of human resources and technology in knowledge based companies. Management and Development Process. 1(1), 1-5. (In Persian)
Lee, A. R. (2021). Investigating Moderators of the Influence of Enablers on Participation in Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities. Sustainability, 13(17), 9883. DOI:10.3390/su13179883
Mansourzadeh, M., Mahmoodi, F., & Hamdollah, H. (2016). Investigating the effective factors on acceptance of ICT among students based on technology acceptance Model 3. Educ Strategy Med Sci, 9(5), 357-370. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355713583_Investigating_the_effective_factors_on_acceptance_of_ICT_among_students_based_on_technology_acceptance_Model_3. (In Persian)
Michelini, R. C. (2008). Knowledge entrepreneurship and sustainable growth.  Nova Science Publishers. New York. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1639620
Mohammadi, M., Sharifi, V., & Nirouzi, Y. (2018). Study of effective factors in Knowledge sharing on the Website employees (Case study: Academic Libraries of Isfahan). Science and techniques of Information Management, 3(4), 943-70. (In Persian)
Mokhtarzadeh, N., Razavi, S. M., Nilforooshan, H., & Faghei, M. (2019). An Investigation on the Factors Affecting the Success of Knowledge Transfer Process in Inter-Firm Collaborations (Case: Pharmaceutical Firm Collaborations). Journal of Industrial Management Perspective8(32), 33-60. (In Persian)
Moradi Pordanjani, H., & Amini Naghani, F. (2014). An introduction to knowledge entrepreneurship. Jahanbin Publications. (In Persian)
Moradi Pordanjani, H., & Siadat, A. (2018). The effect of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Intelligence on Knowledge Entrepreneurship Capabilities Faculty Members of Shahrekord University. Journal of Innovation and Value Creation, 5(3), 87-100. (In Persian)
Musfikar, R. (2017). The best Factors for Influence Knowledge Sharing Among Teachers Through Website Technology. Cyberspace: Journal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 1(2), 101-110. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/cyberspace/article/view/2028
Najafgholinezhad, A., & sadeghzadeh Vayghan, A. (2010). Information technology and optimization of knowledge management: Tools and challenges. Library and Information Sciences13(2), 59-95. (In Persian)
Narmenji, M., Riahinia, N., Nowkarizi, M., & zerehsaz, M. (2020). Information of Effect The Virtual in Behavior Sharing Social on Networks Social Capital. Processing and managing information, 25(3), 605-632. (In Persian)
Osmani, M., Mahmoudi, A., Jihadi, Kh., & Ghasemi Lachin, M. (2013). Web 2 technology and knowledge sharing, First International Conference on Management, Accounting and Economics، Shiraz. (In Persian)
Pan, M., & Pan, W. (2019). Determinants of adoption of robotics in precast concrete production for buildings. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(5), 05019007. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000706
Panahi, S., Watson, J., & Partridge, H. (2016). Information encountering on social media and tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Information Science42(4), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515598883
Parker, D. L. (2017). Knowledge Sharing within Virtual Teams: A Qualitative Case Study of the Role Technology Plays in Team Sharing Practices. Doctoral Dissertation, Northcentral University.
Rafsanjani, H. H. (2015). An interpretive study of the co-creation of knowledge in an online community. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester. https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/
an-interpretive-study-of-the-co-creation-of-knowledge-in-an-onlin
Rajabion, L., & Kheirabadi, A. (2011). Information Technology-It’s Role in Facilitating the Sharing and Transfer of Knowledge in Small Medium Sized Enterprises. In International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing, 2, 275-282. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
287711009_Information_technology_It's_role_in_facilitating_the_sharing_and_transfer_of_knowledge_in_small_medium_sized_enterprises
Siadat seyed, h., & mozafarimehr, A. (2018). A Framework for Knowledge Management System in the Cloud Computing Environment and Web 2. 0, Journal of information processing and management, 33(4), 1418-1393. (In Persian)
Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink?. British journal of management26(4), 582-595.  
Singh, D. B., & Maggon, M. (2009). Knowledge Entrepreneurship in India. Management Insight5(1), 21-29. https://journals.smsvaranasi.com/index.php/managementinsight/article/view/311
Skrzeszewski, S. (2006). The Knowledge entrepreneur. Scarecrow Press. https://www.google.com/books/edition/
The_Knowledge_Entrepreneur/YKEVAQAAIAAJ?hl=en
Soto-Acosta, P., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Popa, S. (2014). Web knowledge sharing and its effect on innovation: An empirical investigation in SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice12(1), 103-113. DOI:10.1057/kmrp.2013.31
Soto-Acosta, P., Perez-Gonzalez, D., & Popa, S. (2014). Determinants of Web 2.0 technologies for knowledge sharing in SMEs. Service Business8(3), 425-438. DOI: 10.1007/s11628-014-0247-9
Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2017). Social web knowledge sharing and innovation performance in knowledge-intensive manufacturing SMEs. The Journal of Technology Transfer42(2), 425-440. DOI:10.1007/s10961-016-9498-z
Taghvaee Yazdi, M., Golafshani, A., Aghamirzaee mahali, T., Aghatabar rodbari, J., & Uosefi Saeed Abadi, R. (2019). Status of using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Its Effect on Faculty Members’ Performance. Research in Medical Science Education, 11 (2), 64-73. (In Persian)
Taherkhani, L., Tahmasebi Limooni, S. T., & Ghiasi, M. (2022). Identify, Analyze and categorize the factors affecting Sharing web knowledge in libraries using the fuzzy Delphi approach. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 20(3), 9-24. (In Persian)
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington books. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Processes_of_Technological_Innovatio/EotRAAAAMAAJ?hl=en
Yang, J. Te. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organisational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 83–90. DOI:10.1108/13673270710738933
Giti Nejad, Z. (2017). Evaluating the quality of information preparation and maintenance in technical documentation information systems and providing a model for information managers. Thesis, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Al-Zahra University, Tehran.