Scientometrics
Elham Abdolahpour; Mansour Kolahkaj
Abstract
Introduction: Methodological study of articles published in 11 scientific research journals in the field of art in 2019 is the problem of the present study and specifically to questions such as how to collect data and what is the approach and type of analysis of these articles and others such as the ...
Read More
Introduction: Methodological study of articles published in 11 scientific research journals in the field of art in 2019 is the problem of the present study and specifically to questions such as how to collect data and what is the approach and type of analysis of these articles and others such as the average number of authors per article, average scientific rank Academic and the predominant gender of the authors and the highest level of group participation among the
Methods: This is a small research and its initial data were collected from scientific databases and then statistically collected and analyzed using research methodological knowledge and scientometric tools. Library resources have also been used for definitions and research concepts.
Results: The data collection method of the majority of articles in the study population was library (66%), combined (field-library) (21%) and field (12%), respectively. Also, the dominant approach of articles is qualitative (88%), quantitative (7%) and combined (5%), respectively. Among the qualitative articles, the method of data collection (about 33%) is articles, libraries and (about 20%) composite (field-library) and among the quantitative articles (about 5%) are libraries, (about 25%) are field questionnaires and (Up to 50%) were interview field and (up to 20%) were combined (library-field). Out of 15 combined articles, the data collection method was 10 combined articles, 4 articles (about 4%) were library articles and 1 article (up to 10%) was a questionnaire field article. The average number of authors per article was 2.1 and most of the authors of the articles (60%) were male. Is the author (48%).
Conclusion: This study showed that the weight of qualitative research is higher than other researches. And the type of analysis was descriptive-analytical with a significant difference more than other types were used and semiotic and comparative analysis, after that, were in the next stage. The hypothesis of this article that most of the articles in the field of art have a qualitative approach and their type of analysis is descriptive-analytical is also confirmed, but a larger comprehensive study of this research found that the types of analysis.
Heidar Mokhtari; Hamidreza Rezaei Omidi; Soodabeh Nozari
Abstract
Introduction and Aim: Correct-writing is the common principle of writing in a language. Correct-writing, especially in scientific writings is a necessity and results in text fluency and perspicacity. This study aimed to critically overview the editing problems in the articles published in the current ...
Read More
Introduction and Aim: Correct-writing is the common principle of writing in a language. Correct-writing, especially in scientific writings is a necessity and results in text fluency and perspicacity. This study aimed to critically overview the editing problems in the articles published in the current Knowledge and Information Science Persian Journals. Method: 89 articles published in the last published issue of 11 journals of the field were undergone content analysis and studied from editing viewpoint in three editing types (including that of technical, structural-lingual, and professional) in the summer and autumn of 2013. Findings: There are enormous deficiencies in this context and prevalence of “bad-writing custom” into the writings in each of the three editing types. Conclusion: Applicable education of Persian in academic studies, authors’ accuracy in writing and the deep care of reviewers and editors are needed for relatively removing these deficiencies.
