An altmetric evaluation of the researchers' scientific activities in Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran

Hakimi, Hooshang

doi:10.22055/slis.2021.37785.1845

An altmetric evaluation of the researchers' scientific activities in Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Hooshang Hakimi

Faculty member/ Agricultural Research, Education &amp; Extension Organization (AREEO)

https://doi.org/10.22055/slis.2021.37785.1845

Abstract

Purpose: The scientific activity of researchers in the Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) was subjected to study by altmetrics in scientific social network, ResearchGate.

Methodology/Approach: This survey was applied in terms of purpose and scientometric methodology with altmetric approach. Relevant data were obtained from the AREEO's scientometric database 2010-2020, as well as the altmetric data from 852 researchers' members of the ResearchGate scientific social network as the holder of the most numerous members and audiences among the scientific social networks in research institutes, national research centers and provincial research centers of the organization. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics included the frequency and mean of each of the indicators measured in the ResearchGate network. Inferential statistics (Spearman correlation tests, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests) were also used to measure the relationships and the presence or absence of differences between the studied variables.

Findings: The results showed that nearly one quarter of the researchers of the population were members of the ResearchGate network. Altmetric data showed that there was a direct relationship between the level of activity in ResearchGate and the academic rank of faculty members; with the increase of academic rank in faculty members, the amount of their scientific activity had also increased. The correlation between R. G. score respectively with citations (0.862), observations (0.813) and writings (0.799) was the strongest among its other indicators, but the weakest with questions (0.124) and answers (0.280).

Conclusion: The participation of the researchers in scientific social networks as a complementary research tool is an informal and non-mandatory scientific professional activity that can be inferred as a sign of potential capacity and desire for more activity to increase the visibility of their works, citations and scientific cooperation. This will increase their scientific activity and access to up-to-date knowledge, and consequently will increase the productivity. Therefore, informing and creating mechanisms by the managers of the bodies are recommended in this field to encourage the researchers to increase the quantity and quality of their scientific outputs.

Keywords

ResearchGate

scientific social network

Scientometrics

Altmetrics

Iran

Subjects

Scientometrics

Ashraf, K., & Haneefa, M. (2016). Scholarly use of social media. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 63(2), 132-139. (In Persian)

Asnafi, A.R. (2015). A reflection on the presence of faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University in the Research Gate scientific network. Human Interaction and Information, 2(3), 61-70. (In Persian)

Batooli, Z. (2013). ResearchGate features for researchers. Science and Technology Discourse, 1(2), 59-68. (In Persian)

Batooli, Z. (2017). The relationship between Web of Science and ResearchGATE indicators of iranian researchers' top papers. Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management, 33(1), 184-161. (In Persian)

Chakraborty, N. (2012). Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars in NEHU: A study on Facebook and ResearchGate, (March 1-3), Gangtok: 8th convention planner. Retrieved May 21, 2018 from http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/handle/1944/1666/3.pdf?sequence=1

Doulani, A., Zand, S., & Baradar, R. (2019). Investigating the activities of the faculty members of Alzahra University in the scientific social network of ResearchGate and its impact on the Scopus citation database and the Google Scholar search engine. Knowledge Retrieval and Semantic Systems, 6(21), 43-69. (In Persian)

Erfan-Manesh, M. A. (2018). Scientific communication in the context of social media: An almetric study of iranian international research outputs. The proceedings of the Second National Conference of the Iranian Library and Information Association - Fars branch: Prospects for scientific communication. May 9-10, 2018. (In Persian)

Erfan-Manesh, M. A., Asnafi, A. R., & Arshadi, H. (2015). Universities and research institutions in ResearchGate: A study of altmetrics. Knowledge Studies, 8(30), 59-72. (In Persian)

Falsafi, S., & Haji-Zeinolabedini, M. (2018). Investigating the scientific activity of the faculty members of Shahid Beheshti University in Mendeli social network. In: The proceedings of the Second National Conference of the Iranian Library and Information Association - Fars branch: Prospects for scientific communication. May 9-10, 2018. 91-103. (In Persian)

Harmelen, M. V. (2012). Analytics for understanding research. JISC CETIS, 1(4).

Jan-Mohammadi, M., Rahmani, M., & Rootan, Z. (2016). Review of RG score indicators and ranking of researchers in ResearchGate (Case study: Faculty members of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran). The first Int’l Interactive Information Retrieval Conference, Kish. (In Persian)

Johnson, B. (2012). How ResearchGate plans to turn science upside down. Retrieved May 11, 2019 from: https://gigaom.com/2012/02/22/how-researchgate-plans-to-turn-science-upside-down

Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2016). The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1602.02412.

Mas-Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014). Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics, 101(1), 337-356.

Nasibi-Sis, H., Valizadeh-Haghi, S., & Shekofteh, M. (2020). ResearchGate Altmetric scores and Scopus bibliometric indicators among lecturers. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 22 (1): 15-24. (In Persian)

Shrivastava, R., & Mahajan, P. (2017). An altmetric analysis of ResearchGate profiles of physics researchers: A study of University of Delhi (India). Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 52-66.

Sotodeh, H., & Saadat, Y. (2018). Surveying the Iranian chemists' attitude toward membership in social research networks. Human Info Interact, 2(3): 1-12. (In Persian)