نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه آموزشی علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی دانشگاه قم

3 مربی علوم کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی پزشکی، دانشکده علوم پزشکی آبادان، آبادان، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
هدف: هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی منابع سرفصل‌های درسی کارشناسی ارشد سه گرایش «مطالعات کتابخانه‌های عمومی»، « مدیریت کتابخانه‌های دانشگاهی» و «مدیریت کتابخانه‌های دیجیتالی» است.
روش‌شناسی: پژوهش از نوع تحقیقات کاربردی است که با استفاده از روش «تحلیل محتوا» انجام شده است. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از سیاهه وارسی استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: درمجموع 525 منبع برای هرسه گرایش معرفی شده است. که 443 عنوان کتاب، 79 عنوان مقاله و 3 عنوان پایان‌نامه بوده و 297 منبع فارسی و 228 منبع انگلیسی بود. بیشترین منابع فارسی برای گرایش «مدیریت کتابخانه‌های دانشگاهی» و بیشترین منابع خارجی برای گرایش «مدیریت کتابخانه‌های دیجیتال» پیشنهاد شده است. 52 درصد از کتب معرفی شده در رده Z قرار دارند. سپس، رده‌های H و Q (علوم) بیشترین قرابت را با حوزه کتابداری داشتند. پرتکرارترین منابع پیشنهادی نیز برای سرفصل مشترک «مبانی کتابداری و علم اطلاعات» بود.
نتیجه‌گیری: از نتایج می‌توان به ارائه سرفصل‌ها و منابع تکراری، انتخاب منابع پیشنهادی از آثار پیشکسوتان و نویسندگان جوان به ترتیب برای سرفصل‌های پایه و جدید و متفاوت بودن منابع و سرفصل حوزه دیجیتال نسبت به دو گرایش دیگر اشاره کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Course Curriculum of Current Trends of Knowledge and Information Science in Iran( Public Library Studies, Academic Libraries Managing and, Digital Library Management

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahdi Mohammadi 1
  • Somayeh Panahi 2
  • Somayeh Parvin 3

1 Department of Literature and Humanities Science, Faculty Member of Knowledge and Information Science, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

2 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, University of Qom,Qom, Iran

3 Instructor in Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, Abadan School of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives: One of the most significant outcomes of the progress of information technology is probably over the training program and its follow-up job requirements. So, revision of curriculum in higher education is one of the rational approaches to the dynamics of academic disciplines. Therefore, education authorities are acting on issues involving the revision of new educational programs in line with how well they meet their society's needs. In the same vein, the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology has placed the necessity of revising the curriculum of all academic disciplines at regular intervals (five years). The study attempts to investigate educational materials presented for trends of "Public Library Studies, Managing Academic Libraries" and, "Digital Library Management".
Methodology: This research is an applied research using the "content analysis" method. To conduct this research, the latest curriculum revised during the 2011-2013 period was analyzed which approved by the Iranian Curriculum Programming Committee on Information and Knowledge Science for these three fields. In order to retrieve various classifications of Persian and English books, researchers were referred to websites of The National Library of Iran and the Library of Congress, respectively. Data was analyzed using Excel software.
Findings: A total of 525 sources for all three trends were introduced that included 443 books, 79 articles, and 3 theses, respectively. Linguistically, 297 Persian and 228 foreign sources were found. The most Persian and English sources are proposed for the trends of "Managing Academic Libraries" and "Digital Library Management". Out of a total of 226 Persian books, 50% of the educational materials found in Z class (bibliography, bibliography, books, books, industry, and book trade), and more specifically in subclass of ZA (Information Sources), then, followed by classes of the H (Social Sciences) and Q (Science). Finally, the choice of resources from the classes P (Language and Literature) and T (Technology) and B (Philosophy, Psychology, and Religion) was also considered at 12.3%. The retrieval results showed that out of a total of 166 English books, more than 54% of the educational materials have been belonged to Z class and then the most resources from the class H (16%) and Q (14%). There are few sources in the Ttechnology and Law classes. The fewest introduced resources to belong to classes as following the D (History), philosophy (B), and (C). Of course, there are no sources in L class) Education) and G (Geography) and P (Language and Literature), and J (Political Science). Also, most of the proposed works in the field belong to "Rahmatollah Fattahi" and "Mohammad Hasanzadeh" and in the field of articles, the most works were written by "Yaghoub Norouzi" and "Azam Sanatjoo". The most frequent references were also for the common headline of the "Foundations of Library and Information Science".
Discussion: There is no source for the Seminar headlines except in the trend of "Digital Libraries Management". In fact, the lack of attention to these units has caused many problems in the writing of thesis and scientific papers, and it can be concluded that there is significant relationship between this defect and the skill level of students and the potential of their research ideas, it is possible that negligence can be attributed to Curriculum Programming Committee, because it does not seem logical to include practical units without introducing the offered courses for teaching. It often seems that misconduct has not occurred deliberately due to researchers’ lack of knowledge of the proper methods of studying and adapting the work of others. Therefore, it's better to always include prominent theses in various headlines. Fortunately, half of the books were listed in Z class. Other remarkable points can be the lack of proposed resources in the T class. Indeed, the lack of choice textbooks of technology class to confront the digital and information society can be concerning and should be taken in future reviews. According to the findings, the review of research shows, the need for review at regular intervals (maximum five years) can contribute to the coherence of the presentation of headlines and suggested suitable resources for different trends in the field

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "Course Curriculum"
  • "Academic Libraries Managing"
  • "Digital libraries Management"
  • "Public Library Studies"
  • "Knowledge and Information Science"
Alipoor-Nodushan, K., Talachi, H., & Khoshgam, M. (2006). A review on Librarian science and informatics publications and their agreement with contents of approved headlines courses 1978-2004. Journal of Health Administration, 9(25). Retrieved from http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-332-fa.html
Amraei, M., Geraei, E., & Siamaki, S. (2013). Subject trends of Persian publications in LIS, 1994-2008. NASTINFO, 24(3), 78–91.
Amunga, H., & Khayesi, M. K. (2012). Library and Information Science Education in Kenya: An Overview of Potential and Challenges. In SCECSAL XX Conference, Nairobi.
Bii, H., & Monica, W. R. (2016). Library and information science (LIS) education and training in Kenya: Emergence, evolution, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 8(2), 11–18.
Bronstein, J. (2007). Current trends in library and information studies curricula around the world: Looking for the user-centred approach. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 5(2/3), 59–78.
Dayani, M.-H. (1989). Thesis, an abandoned unknown treasure. Library and Information Sciences, 2(8), 1-16. [In Persain].
Dayani, M.-H. (2000a). Course Curriculum of a Master’s Degree in Library and Information Science: Recomendation for Innovation. Library and Information Sciences, 3(9), 1-20. [In Persian]. Retrieved from https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/952030
Dayani, M.-H. (2000b). Numerous book publishing by young librarians; Ordinary routine or special librarianship phenomenon. Library and Information Science, 3(51), 5-8. [In Persain].
Edegbo, W. O. (2011). Curriculum development in library and information science education in Nigerian universities: issues and prospects. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1.
Fattahi, R. (2000). A model for revision and restructuring of training of Library and Information Science due to new developments in the information environment in Iran. Library and Information Sciences, 3(9), 21–44.
Fattahi, R., Parirokh, M., Davarpanah, M. R., & Azad, A. (2012). The New MA Curriculum for Librarianship and Information Scinece: The Report of a Research Project. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 4(2), 69–81.
Fattahi, R., Rajabali-Bieglu, R., & Akhshik, S.-S. (2004). An Overview on the past, present and future of Library and Information Science in Iran, A look at the formation of the achievements and challenges of the development of Knowledge and Information Science. Shiraz: RICeST: Nameh Parsi.
Hamdipour, A., & Jowkar, A. (2000). Necessity of change in the curriculum of the Master’s Degree in Library and Information Science. Library and Information Science, 14(18), 9-26. [In Persian].
Hassanzadeh, M. (2004). The role of librarians and information professionals in the organizations’ knowledge management. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 15(3), 101–114. Retrieved from http://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_677.html
Hayati, Z. (2004). Information science education in Iran: Past, present, future. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 15(1), 25–41. Retrieved from http://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_705.html
Hayati, Z., & Fattahi, R. (2001). Librarianship in Iran since 1979. In International Librarianship: Cooperation and Collaboration (pp. 275–290). Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Heidari, G. (2010). Training of Library and Information Science in Iran: Barriers and Solutions. Library and Information Sciences, 14(54), 71-105. [In Persain].
Hori, A. (1390). Necessity of Three Dimensional Approach to Triating Library and Information Science. Ketab Mah Koliat, (166), 10-11. [In Persian]. Retrieved from https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/960790
Kokabee, M. (1997). A galance at the headlines of materials organizing. Quarterly Book, 3(8), 57-69.[In Parsian].
Mohammadi, M., & Motaghy-Dadgar, A. (2008). A Comparative Analysis of LIS Master Degree Exams between State and Islamic Azad Universities (1381-1386). Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 40(46). Retrieved from http://ensani.ir/fa/article/191455
Mokhtari, H. (2005). Curriculum of Field of Medical librarianship and information Science in Master’s degree. Quarterly Book, (62), 25–32.
Nowkarizi, M. (2004). A Study on the Undergraduate Curriculum of Library and Information Science. Library and Information Science, 2(7), 5-23.[In Persian].
Panahi, S., Parvin, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2018). Content and citation analysis of proposed curriculum of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology for the course syllabus of Master’s degree in Scientometrics. Scientometrics Research, Article in Press. https://doi.org/10.22070/RSCI.2018.755
Shahbazi, R., Fahimnia, F., Hakimzadeh, R., & Fadaee-Araghi, G. (2005). An Analysis of the Curriculum of the Bachelors and Master’s Degree Program in the Field of Knowledge Information Science based on emerging Job Opportunities in line with Information Technology in the global Market. Library and Information Sciences, 18(70), 103-140. [In Persain].
Tahavori, Z. (2006). Necessity for revision of library and information sciences educational programs, regarding new skills needed by librarians and information scientists. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization(NASTINFO), 17(1). Retrieved from http://ensani.ir/fa/article/225721
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2014). Mass Media Research: An Introduction (Tenth). Boston, Mass.: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.